Re: Strong evidence of the rarity of false rape accusations

"Alan Mackenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Quite simply, there have been very few victims of such accusations
> posting here on t.r.

Try doing a Google search on the Innocence Project. In some cases the women
did ID their attackers
but DNA evidence said the men couldn't have raped the women. I did not go
through all cases, and these
may not qualify as a FRA, but it will show that men have spent time in
prison, partly on the word of a woman.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/05/14/dna.rape/
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/v-pfriendly/story/113435p-102415c.html
http://www.innocenceproject.org/case/display_profile.php?id=01
http://www.innocenceproject.org/case/display_profile.php?id=17

In fact, I cannot recall a single one in nearly
> five years of posting here.  Not even in the crossposted threads from
> soc.men, where one would expect such to appear.
>
> The nearest to it was an account from Misty, one of whose acquaintances
> was such a victim.  But he wasn't convicted, not even charged - the
> police investigated the allegations against him conscientiously and found
> them groundless (so much for always believing the rape "victim") and
> dropped the case.  His losses were financial only (though apparently
> quite considerable).

You say that like it's not a big deal. You must really be wealthy and can
afford to take
financial losses.
>
> So, where are all these victims of FRAs?  Why are they not posting here?
> I mean, we've even had a rapist (a credible one, that is, not a crude
> troll) posting here.  Have any FRA victims been posting on soc.men?
>
> This all suggests to me that FRAs are rare indeed, much rarer than rapes.
>
> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter
> (like "aa"), remove half of them (leaving, say, "a").
>