
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK
- __From__: Rarin Horse
- __Subject__: Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:53:26 -0600
[snip]
> I wasn't commenting on if it was too low or what too low would be. The
> poster had said that they thought the age of consent would be lowered. I
> said that I have never heard of the age of consent being lowered, only
> raised. In my state, the age of consent used to be 14, but has been raised
> to 16. People are talking, now, about raising it to 17 or 18. I have
> never heard any in power talking about lowering it back to 14. I have
> never heard of anyone in power talking about lowering the AOC anywhere, for
> anything. I just don't see it happening in the future.
Yes, and this trend upwards coincides with the onset of menstruation happening
at ever-younger ages.
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK, (continued)
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Rarin Horse
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Ann
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Alan Mackenzie
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Ann
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Jim Justjim
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
P Diddy
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Jim Justjim
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
P Diddy
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Jim Justjim
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
P Diddy
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Rarin Horse
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Ann
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
P Diddy
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Neil
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Neil
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
P Diddy
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Neil
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
John James
- Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK,
Jim Justjim