
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Cele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:05:02 +1100, "Darkfalz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're talking about rape. If what you're saying is that rape survivors ought to take 'personal responsibility' for 'errors of judgement' that you feel have contributed to the commission of a crime against them, then I presume that this goes also for victims of FRAs, who, according to this standard, ought not to associate with the 'wrong kind of women' and ought to be more careful and so on and so forth?
Nobody is saying women need to take responsibility for actually being
raped,
but certainly for putting herself in precarious situations where her
chances
of being raped massively increase (which is when MOST genuine rapes
happen).
I vehemently question the statement that this constitutes 'most' or '99.9%' of actual rapes. My experience suggests otherwise. Can you back up this claim?
Er, like the fact that the "stranger jumping out of the bushes" scenario only accounts for about 5% of rapes?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |