Re: Sexual Offences Act 2003, UK

"P Diddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jim Justjim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > http://www.gaylawnet.com/news/2000/ag2000.htm#united_kingdom
> >
> > This is about evening out the age of consent for homosexuals.  This IS
> > lowering the AOC, but this isn't really what I am talking about.  This
> > isn't really about lowering the age of consent, it is about equal
> > rights for gays.
> >
> > > In South Africa:
> > >
> > > http://www.acdppta.org.za/Press/ParlNews8Sep03.htm
> >
> > Same thing.  It is about lowering the AOC for gays so that it is equal
> > to that of heterosexuals.
> >
> > > Just about everywhere else:
> > >
> > > http://www.advocate.com/html/news/120500/120500news09.asp
> >
> > This is about a PROPOSAL to lower the AOC, not that it has been
> > lowered.
> >
> > > This one indicates that the AOC for both homosexual and heterosexual
> > > sex was recently reduced in Russia:
> > >
> > > http://moscow.uncut.ru/history.htm
> >
> > It also says that it is in the process of being raised back to 16.
> >
> > > And this one for Estonia:
> > >
> > > http://www.gaylawnet.com/news/2001/ag01.htm
> >
> > Again, this is equalizing the age of consent for homosexuals.
>
> So to clarify...are you saying he did not prove his point with those
> links?

He proved HIS point, but I was thinking about it in a different way.

>
> >
> > > Neil