
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Cele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:05:02 +1100, "Darkfalz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> We're talking about rape. If what you're saying is that rape survivors > >> ought to take 'personal responsibility' for 'errors of judgement' that > >> you feel have contributed to the commission of a crime against them, > >> then I presume that this goes also for victims of FRAs, who, according > >> to this standard, ought not to associate with the 'wrong kind of women' > >> and ought to be more careful and so on and so forth? > > > >Nobody is saying women need to take responsibility for actually being raped, > >but certainly for putting herself in precarious situations where her chances > >of being raped massively increase (which is when MOST genuine rapes happen). > > I vehemently question the statement that this constitutes 'most' or > '99.9%' of actual rapes. My experience suggests otherwise. Can you > back up this claim? Er, like the fact that the "stranger jumping out of the bushes" scenario only accounts for about 5% of rapes?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |