
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Jim Justjim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > http://www.gaylawnet.com/news/2000/ag2000.htm#united_kingdom > > This is about evening out the age of consent for homosexuals. This IS > lowering the AOC, but this isn't really what I am talking about. This > isn't really about lowering the age of consent, it is about equal rights > for gays. > > > In South Africa: > > > > http://www.acdppta.org.za/Press/ParlNews8Sep03.htm > > Same thing. It is about lowering the AOC for gays so that it is equal to > that of heterosexuals. > > > Just about everywhere else: > > > > http://www.advocate.com/html/news/120500/120500news09.asp > > This is about a PROPOSAL to lower the AOC, not that it has been lowered. > > > This one indicates that the AOC for both homosexual and heterosexual > > sex was recently reduced in Russia: > > > > http://moscow.uncut.ru/history.htm > > It also says that it is in the process of being raised back to 16. > > > And this one for Estonia: > > > > http://www.gaylawnet.com/news/2001/ag01.htm > > Again, this is equalizing the age of consent for homosexuals. So to clarify...are you saying he did not prove his point with those links? > > > Neil
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |