
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Society" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "P Diddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > David Lee Kollberg whined... > > > > > > John James wrote... > > > > > > > > Society explained... > > > > > > > > > > Your real beef, John James, is that the adults here > > > > > fully comprehend what you are about. Now that you've > > > > > admitted your fascination with Islamic law style practices > > > > > of whacking bits off of the bodies of those whose > > > > > behavior you disapprove of, John James, are you > > > > > ready to embrace the other aspects of the practices > > > > > of Sharia you endorse? > > > > > > > > > > This thread has smoked out a number of hypocrites > > > > > just like you, John James, tho' that was probably > > > > > not Daria's intention. Just about everything that > > > > > hooligan bleats backfires but why should Daria be > > > > > different from all the other feminists? Ha ha ha. > > > > > > > > Is there a doctor in the house? I think S has skipped his > > > > medication big style. > > Wow, John James, you use such compelling arguments > to support your case! Or so you imagine. Ha ha ha. It was not an argument - 'twas an observation. How else should one react to reading wholesale inventions of one's opinions? > > And surely you got some idea about meds from your > own habits, JJ. IOW, you are 'projecting'. Nope - extrapolating, not projecting. I take prescription meds. Should I miss them for a protracted period, no doubt I might end up writing the sort of twaddle you do. Since this was peculiarly bizarre twaddle, even for you, I hypothesised as to the cause. > > > > > You will of course let everyone know where exactly I > > > > expressed any opinion whatsoever in this thread on > > > > 'Islamic law practices', 'Sharia', 'whacking bits off bodies', > > > > or any of these other strange opinions you've invented for > > > > me, won't you? > > Such opinions on your part are implicit in your past posts, > including your posts in this thread in which you were > Kollberg's apologist. *YAWN* - Ah yes, of course they are. IOW, you *won't* let everyone know where I expressed these 'opinions' you've invented for me. Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose. For the record, I do not support castration, circumcision or any other form of genital mutilation or chemical injury- regardless of motive. I've said so many times before. When you want to discuss what I actually *write*, S, get back to me. [...] John James (JJ)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |