Re: Castration.

Ann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 28 Nov 2003 20:31:07 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Magic Nose
> Goblin) wrote:
> 
> >Ann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:37:00 GMT, "Cesariana Oveila Hysterectum"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >
> >> >"Yin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >> What do you think about castration for sex offenses?  I heared it
> >> >> reduces recedivism to 3%.  Should it be used instead of prison or
> >> >> along with it?
> >> >
> >> >Better question might be: Do you support castration of those who file false
> >> >sex abuse allegations, if the sentence you propose became law?
> >> 
> >> Why would that be a *better* question?  It's simply a different one.
> >> 
> >
> >Translation: How DARE he ask an embarassing question!
> 
> Translation: I can't answer that so I'll say something else instead.

Got undies-in-a-bunch?


> 
> >> >What compensation should the state provide to those falsely convicted? The
> >> >FBI found (by going back to old cases with new DNA science) that fully a
> >> >third of those in prison for sex abuse offenses were innocent.
> >> 
> >> And this is a different one again.  Do you have a view on the question
> >> asked?
> >
> >
> >Translation: How DARE he ask an embarassing question....AGAIN!!!
> 
> Translations: I can't answer that again so I'll just so say more of
> the same.
> 

More undies in a bunch.

> Ann
> 
> >
> >> 
> >> Ann