Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Jackson to accuse boy's mother



"unicorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am going to agree with ann.  If they do take his kids away and in
> the end it is proven the micheal jackson is not guilty, that will be
> alot of traumatization the the children did not need to go throught in
> the first place
> unicorn

You dont think it's *traumatic* to be taken away from the ONLY family you've
known since birth?

>
> Ann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > On 26 Nov 2003 07:03:25 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sky King) wrote:
> >
> > <lots of snipping in order to find the new material more easily>
> > >> > > >> >>>> >And he should not have his 3 children while all of this
goes on.
> >  This
> > >> > > >> >>>> >according to
> > >> > > >> >>>> >famed attorney Gloria Allred who thinks his kids should
be taken
> >  into
> > >> > > >> >>>> >protective custody.
> > >> > > >> >>>>
>http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30500-12933136,00.html
> > >> > > >> >>>> >To my knowledge nobody has ever accusec Micahel Jackson
of
> > >> >  abusing
> > >> >  his
> > >> >  kids.
> > >> > > >> >>>> >Isn't there a presumption of innocence until proven
guilty in a
> >  court of
> > >> > > >> >>>> >law?
> > >> > > >> >>>>
> > >> > > >> >>>> I make no comment about what should happen in this
particular case
> >  but
> > >> > > >> >>>> it is quite usual for children to be taken into care
pending
> > >> > > >> >>>> investigations.  I suspect that had they been anyone
else's
> >  children,
> > >> > > >> >>>> they would already have been taken away.
> > >> > > >> >>>>
> > >> > > >> >>>> Ann
> > >> > > >> >>>
> > >> > > >> >>>I'm not sure I agree with you. Once again *his* kids are
not thought
> > >> >  to
> > >> >  be
> > >> > > >> >>>abused.
> > >> > > >>
>>>http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XII/169-C/169-C-6.htm
> > >> > > >> >>
> > >> > > >> >>Your link is not relevant.  A court order would be sought.
> > >> > > >> >>
> > >> > > >> >>Ann
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >On what grounds?  Are we going to start taking kids away from
parents
> > >> > > >> >before anything is proven..if so any unfounded allegation
could lead
> > >> > > >> >to the authorities coming into your home and taking your
children or
> > >> > > >> >mine or anyones.  I just think its another slippery slope.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> It happens already.  This is what happens here and I daresay
it's the
> > >> > > >> same with you.
> > >
> > >Well its not the same here. By the way Mikey has not been charged with
any
> > >crime YET. That may not come until Dec.
> >
> > It works similarly in the US.  Not talking about this specific case.
> >
> > According to the BBC, Jackson has been charged.
> >
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/showbiz/3233408.stm
> >
> > Ann





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.