Re: Castration.

On 28 Nov 2003 20:31:07 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Magic Nose
Goblin) wrote:

>Ann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:37:00 GMT, "Cesariana Oveila Hysterectum"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> >
>> >"Yin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >> What do you think about castration for sex offenses?  I heared it
>> >> reduces recedivism to 3%.  Should it be used instead of prison or
>> >> along with it?
>> >
>> >Better question might be: Do you support castration of those who file false
>> >sex abuse allegations, if the sentence you propose became law?
>> 
>> Why would that be a *better* question?  It's simply a different one.
>> 
>
>Translation: How DARE he ask an embarassing question!

Translation: I can't answer that so I'll say something else instead.

>> >What compensation should the state provide to those falsely convicted? The
>> >FBI found (by going back to old cases with new DNA science) that fully a
>> >third of those in prison for sex abuse offenses were innocent.
>> 
>> And this is a different one again.  Do you have a view on the question
>> asked?
>
>
>Translation: How DARE he ask an embarassing question....AGAIN!!!

Translations: I can't answer that again so I'll just so say more of
the same.

Ann

>
>> 
>> Ann