Re: Rape Education Story #64

avenger wrote:
> "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Robert Lee wrote:
> >
> > > "Bo Raxo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Wow, can I be a victim of a false accusation?  For a million bucks,
> > > > they can say I raped Mother Teresa for all I care.
> > >
> > >
> > > This goes way beyond a false accusation, Bo: the university essentially
> > > tried this guy without his knowledge, pressured the alleged "victim" to
> > > declare him guilty over and over against her will and then lied when she
> > > wouldn't, and then notified him that he wouldn't be getting the
> > > certification he'd earned over a criminal charge they'd pretty much
> > > invented only after he'd paid for it in money, time and successful
> > > effort. They broke their own internal codes in doing so, never mind
> legal
>
> > > contracts with the guy.
> >
> > There were real criminals in that case.  But the Gonzaga University
> > officials were never charged with their crimes.
>
>
> In any sane and decent country where the Federal Prosecutors were doing
> their job the University officials would have been charged with conspiracy
> to violate this man's civil rights, a criminal as well as a civil charge.

Indeed.  Unfortunately the US Femernment believes that white men have no 
civil rights, so they ignore any and all harm done to white men. 
Criminal conspiracies agaisnt white men are never prosecuted.

Bob


> While civil rights violations usually involve the government or an agent of
> the government eg. a cop or any person acting in concert with a government
> agent, Universities all receive funding from the government and must operate
> under the Federal Laws in the USC as well as State criminal and civil law. I
> didn't see the complaint or if it did include civil rights violations but
> apparently this student won at trial and the jury should have awarded high
> punitive damages due to the fact that members of the school administration
> acted in a malicious and unlawful manner. Just because he was a student does
> not give them the right to circumvent the law because they were accusing him
> of a criminal offence. This wasn't a case of a student violating some school
> rule.
>
> > > There's nothing particularly absurd about him getting a million bucks
> for
>
> > > a seven year fight over that, considering legal fees. Let's guess...I
> > > dunno, something mid-low, like 40K as average salary+benefits he could
> > > have taken in on his earned certification over those seven years. That's
> > > almost $300K. Then figure punitive damages, which the Supreme Court says
> > > can be the same as the real damages, but no more, so--we're up to $600K,
> > > now. 40% of award is not unusual for attorney's fees, so...hey, whaddya
> > > know, we already got to a million bucks, and all the guy gets is double
> > > what he should have earned, and that's guessing low, plus a little extra
> > > for all the trouble of getting reamed up the ass by a bunch of
> busybodies
>
> > > who should have known better.