
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers
- __From__: Kate Orman
- __Subject__: Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers
- __Date__: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:33:41 -0600
Daran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 24 Nov 2003 17:17:27 -0800 Kate Orman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > (There may also be good legal reasons I'm not
> > aware of for not having a specific "false accusation" offence.)
> There might, but given that one of your central complaints about the
> assertions made by your opponents has been 'insufficient evidence',
> objections raised by you with no evidence whatsoever, carry little weight.
That's *not* an objection. I just wanted to leave the door open so as to
look less like an idiot if someone with legal expertise said "Duh, that's
the Principle of Frankus" or something. :-)
Yours,
- Kate Orman
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers, (continued)
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Rich
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
P Diddy
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Bob
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Kate Orman
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Rich
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Kate Orman
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Daran
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Kate Orman
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Sky King
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Rich
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Scott Gilbert
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false rape accusers,
Magic Nose Goblin
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false rape accusers,
Kate Orman
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Kate Orman
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Kate Orman
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false accusers,
Kate Orman
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false rape accusers,
Bob
- Re: Bad idea: Punishing false rape accusers,
Dee Fish out of Korea