
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,7956168%255E401,00.html > > Jackson to accuse boy's mother > > By Robert Lusetich and The Times > 24nov03 > > MICHAEL Jackson's defence looks as if it will be based on the motives of > the mother of the boy at the centre of child molestation allegations > against the pop star. > > Gavin Arvizo, who turns 14 next month, has been named by several media > organisations as Jackson's accuser. As in so many other cases, it's readily apparent that the media won't print women's names or girls names, but when the purported rape victim is an underage male, it seems that printing the name is not a problem. And yet reading Waldo's rape stories, even women being charged with making false rape accusations don't get their names in the press (with one or two exceptions). Anyone see the slightest hint of bias here? Maybe not. Rich
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |