Re: Castration.

"Ann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:37:00 GMT, "Cesariana Oveila Hysterectum"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Yin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> What do you think about castration for sex offenses?  I heared it
> >> reduces recedivism to 3%.  Should it be used instead of prison or
> >> along with it?
> >
> >Better question might be: Do you support castration of those who file
false
> >sex abuse allegations, if the sentence you propose became law?

> Why would that be a *better* question?  It's simply a different one.

I see no contraction; what is your point?

Without an understanding of the whole consequence, one can hardly make an
informed conclusion.

> >What compensation should the state provide to those falsely convicted?
The
> >FBI found (by going back to old cases with new DNA science) that fully a
> >third of those in prison for sex abuse offenses were innocent.
>
> And this is a different one again.  Do you have a view on the question
> asked?
>
> Ann

That in its narrow form, it is irresponsible to take a position on the
question posed. YMMV.