Re: Poor Rich is still traumatized. was >>Re: To each their own.

"David Lee Kollberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "David Lee Kollberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > "David Lee Kollberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey dimwit, your very first post here was this...
> > >
> > > [snipped Rich's deep-rooted hatred]
> >
> > They were are are your words DLK.
> 
> They were are are..? Is that a triple negative? Are you trying to confuse me
> even more about your twisty motives?

Passive aggressive to the very end.

> In fact the words you are referring to were the precise words that I
> described some minutes later to have been a joke,

No, much later, after many objections. And you can call it a joke,
but that does not make it a joke. It was not in the form of a joke,
there was no play on words, there was no punch line, it was as much
a joke as it was a play by Shakespear. I'll accept that you find the
rape of men funny, but what you posted was not a joke.

> but to you that simply wasn't (and dare I say isn't) acceptable, huh?

It's an excuse every bit as lame as the post it refers to.

> You always say that I post nothing but lies, 

This is another lie on your part.

> yet you take this one post seriously?

You slandered me out of the blue, I responded. You are no more the
victim here than you were for your original post. In both cases
you attacked without reason or merit.

> Why is that, I
> wonder? Maybe it's because you can use it for all infinity to utter your
> random hate? Just go ahead now, . loser.

I responded to your hatred DLK. Calling me more names may seem an
answer to someone who thinks gratuitous rape is an answer. Clearly
it does in your case.

> > > Dear Rich,
> > >
> > > I see you're still not over it?
> >
> > I merely responded to your fruther lies.
> 
> Nevertheless you still seem rather tense about a thing that happened over a
> year ago (something that I wouldn't think worth mentioning after one single
> day). 

No DLK, I was responding to your slander a few days ago, in which you
referenced my response to your wish that I be gratuitously raped.
The words are directly below starting with a #. Do try and pay attention.

> I may not be a very happy man (I'm depressed as hell, as a matter of
> fact) 

And you think this excuses everything, is that it?

> but I suppose you most be a lot *lot* worse, to carry around that much
> hate about a stupid joke after more than a year..

One more time, I was responding to your current slander, in which you
lie about my response to your post where you claim I should be raped.
No doubt you'd be happy to do it yourself were I to live where you live.

#> I haven't read her latest posts, so it definitely is all about our preceding
#> encounters. I don't easily put these things behind me. I still remember
#> Rich's hateful conduct toward me very well, and he hasn't been around for
#> ages (it seems).
> 
> I was talking about the enormous amount of relentless slander that you've
> put upon me after my 'no-no' joke.

I always responded to your specific lies DLK. 

> I guess for you it still wasn't (and
> never will be) sufficient to reprimand me (to say to me that it's not
> suitable to tell jokes like that - which I admitted to fairly short after
> 'the incident'). You cannot restrain yourself from doing it again? Just go
> ahead now, ... loser.

Hey stupid, if you don't want to talk about the past, don't bring it
up yourself in random slander. You raised the issue, now we will discuss
it.

> > The simple fact is that it was
> > your post that was hateful.
> 
> And I've admitted to that many, many times. I'll do it again: that post was
> stupid and hateful and I regret that I've posted it.

I don't see any sign of regret. That you claim my reaction was hatred
rather proves that you still feel you were in the right and that I
was in the wrong for objecting. You are unrepentant, and IHO, you
don't truely understand the concept, and are totally unable to offer
an honest apology (and even unable to understand to whom the apology
belongs).

> > I don't think you can see it, and I don't
> > think that you can take responsibility for what you post.
> 
> But I do, Rich. I do. (See a few lines up.)

I see you referring to my reaction as hatred DLK.

> > > How long has it been, a little over a year?
> >
> > At what point do your lies become truth DLK?
> 
> I don't know what you consider to be lies and what not, Rich, 

When you post that I have said things that I have not said DLK.
But I don't think the concept within your grasp.

> since you seem to believe that I *truly* wanted you raped?

Have I ever said that your original post was a lie?

> > > Are you really going to start your boring and dimwitted retaliation
> > > flood all over again[*]?
> >
> > Every fucking time you lie about it and I am here to see it.
> >
> > > Doesn't this make you kind of a loser?
> >
> > Defending myself from your slander and lies? I don't think so.
> >
> > # From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > # Subject: justifiable rape
> > #
> > # Newsgroups: talk.rape
> > # Date: 2002-11-05 07:19:04 PST
> > #
> > # Some senseless postings by Rich instigate that raping him might almost
> > # be justifiable.
> > #
> > # DLK
> > #
> > #http://www.mybluenotes.tk/
> > #
> > #PS: I said "almost".
> >
> > But then, you think posts like yours make you a winner.
> 
> That's truly funny. 

Yes, you would think so.

> I don't think *anyone* here can accuse me of thinking of myself 
> as a winner, Rich.

Accuse? Seems a simple observation. You are on the attack once again,
as smug and superior as always.

> Certainly not in view of the fact that I am taking
> the time to reply to some loser's brainless insults once again.

See?
 
> > > DLK
> > >
> > > http://www.mybluenotes.tk
> > >
> > > PS: Your continued fixation with me is at the same time scary, 
> > > idiotic and funny.
> >
> > You remain a lying self-centered asshole DLK.
> 
> I'm not as obsessed with myself as you seem to be, though.

I'd say that your postings rather disprove that. You are totally 
self-centered.

> > You cause dissent wherever
> > you roam, you attack gratutiously with no reason and no purpose. You
> > destroy, and you think it good.
> >
> > > [*] Just go ahead now.
> >
> > You want me to stop responding, stop posting your lies.
> 
> To you the line "just go ahead now" is the same as me saying "I want you to
> stop responding"? No wonder you take things the wrong way, if you cannot
> read what is written..

This from a man who thinks gratuitous rape a joke? You have your laugh
DLK. Have a good laugh. 

Rich

> DLK
> 
> http://www.mybluenotes.tk
> 
> I've got a strong urge to fly.
> But I got nowhere to fly to.
> -- Roger Waters (Pink Floyd)
> 
> 
> >
> > Rich