Re: Poor Rich is still traumatized. was >>Re: To each their own.

"Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "David Lee Kollberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "David Lee Kollberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey dimwit, your very first post here was this...
> >
> > [snipped Rich's deep-rooted hatred]
>
> They were are are your words DLK.

They were are are..? Is that a triple negative? Are you trying to confuse me
even more about your twisty motives?

In fact the words you are referring to were the precise words that I
described some minutes later to have been a joke, but to you that simply
wasn't (and dare I say isn't) acceptable, huh? You always say that I post
nothing but lies, yet you take this one post seriously? Why is that, I
wonder? Maybe it's because you can use it for all infinity to utter your
random hate? Just go ahead now, . loser.

> > Dear Rich,
> >
> > I see you're still not over it?
>
> I merely responded to your fruther lies.

Nevertheless you still seem rather tense about a thing that happened over a
year ago (something that I wouldn't think worth mentioning after one single
day). I may not be a very happy man (I'm depressed as hell, as a matter of
fact) but I suppose you most be a lot *lot* worse, to carry around that much
hate about a stupid joke after more than a year..

> #> I haven't read her latest posts, so it definitely is all about our
preceding
> #> encounters. I don't easily put these things behind me. I still remember
> #> Rich's hateful conduct toward me very well, and he hasn't been around
for
> #> ages (it seems).

I was talking about the enormous amount of relentless slander that you've
put upon me after my 'no-no' joke. I guess for you it still wasn't (and
never will be) sufficient to reprimand me (to say to me that it's not
suitable to tell jokes like that - which I admitted to fairly short after
'the incident'). You cannot restrain yourself from doing it again? Just go
ahead now, ... loser.

> The problem is yours. The problem has always been yours. The
> lies remain yours. You consider responding to your suggestion that
> I be justifuyably raped as hateful.

Since "the lies are mine", you shouldn't even discuss anything with me, in
my opinion.

> The simple fact is that it was
> your post that was hateful.

And I've admitted to that many, many times. I'll do it again: that post was
stupid and hateful and I regret that I've posted it.

> I don't think you can see it, and I don't
> think that you can take responsibility for what you post.

But I do, Rich. I do. (See a few lines up.)

> > How long has it been, a little over a year?
>
> At what point do your lies become truth DLK?

I don't know what you consider to be lies and what not, Rich, since you seem
to believe that I *truly* wanted you raped?

> > Are you really going to start your boring and dimwitted retaliation
flood
> > all over again[*]?
>
> Every fucking time you lie about it and I am here to see it.
>
> > Doesn't this make you kind of a loser?
>
> Defending myself from your slander and lies? I don't think so.
>
> # From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> # Subject: justifiable rape
> #
> # Newsgroups: talk.rape
> # Date: 2002-11-05 07:19:04 PST
> #
> # Some senseless postings by Rich instigate that raping him might almost
be
> # justifiable.
> #
> # DLK
> #
> #http://www.mybluenotes.tk/
> #
> #PS: I said "almost".
>
> But then, you think posts like yours make you a winner.

That's truly funny. I don't think *anyone* here can accuse me of thinking of
myself as a winner, Rich. Certainly not in view of the fact that I am taking
the time to reply to some loser's brainless insults once again.

> > DLK
> >
> > http://www.mybluenotes.tk
> >
> > PS: Your continued fixation with me is at the same time scary, idiotic
and
> > funny.
>
> You remain a lying self-centered asshole DLK.

I'm not as obsessed with myself as you seem to be, though.

> You cause dissent wherever
> you roam, you attack gratutiously with no reason and no purpose. You
> destroy, and you think it good.
>
> > [*] Just go ahead now.
>
> You want me to stop responding, stop posting your lies.

To you the line "just go ahead now" is the same as me saying "I want you to
stop responding"? No wonder you take things the wrong way, if you cannot
read what is written..

DLK

http://www.mybluenotes.tk

I've got a strong urge to fly.
But I got nowhere to fly to.
-- Roger Waters (Pink Floyd)


>
> Rich