Re: To each their own. was: Re: Perhaps Cele has a crush on Sky? was: Re: NEIL---SOC.MEN take note MORE RAPE TALK ON THE NEIL ARTHUR

"John James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Lots of dynamics while I've been away it seems - some of them very
strange.
> Rather than scrolling endlessly back to find the OP BTW, my belated best
> wishes to Ann on her good news. I hope that doesn't qualify me for TRIS
> sycophancy. Well actually... I don't *give* a fuck - sorry Ellen.

Hi JJ,

>
> "David Lee Kollberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "DEDHeather94" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > I'm not sure why the love for Sky King all of a sudden,
> > > but I think David is angry because several of you have
> > > been trying to actually reason with the Ellen-troll.
> >
> > This is certainly an aspect.
>
> Oh dear, I do hope not.

That it's an aspect that plays a small role in the way that I've spoken to
Cele. Are you never guilty of something similar, then?

> That would mean that you are feigning a mock concern
> for Terry's treatment..

I'm not feigning anything, because that would mean I'm a troll, and I'm not.

> .. on this ng as means of revenge for other members of
> the group not supporting your attempt to dismiss the Lady Ellen.

Again, it was only something that played a minor role in the way I did
things, not *why* I did it.

> By any
> standards that is rather a shallow and mean-minded tactic, David.

I *am* a shallow person, but not in this matter. You are drawing the wrong
conclusions (but you're not alone in this). Maybe it's mass hysteria?

> I thought
> you better than that.

Okay. So far I've fallen from grace for Daran, Neil, Cele, Laurie, JJ, ..
(I'm starting to lose count).

[...]

> > It's rather annoying to witness how Daran shows general esteem for an
> > obvious troll, but finds it necessary to reprimand me on several
occasions
> > when talking to Ellen. I essentially don't want to get caught up in
those
> > kinds of games, certainly not when I got little to do with them.
>
> You have everything to do with them, David. I have noticed a distinct
> tendency on your part to post one-liners in response to the Lady, even
after
> it is clear they are not provoking a response.

I said that I have nothing to do with Daran and Ellen's interactions, JJ.

> That is chasing the ace - all
> it gets you is increasingly frustrated and angry.

I agree. I've decided to perhaps change my attitude somewhat.

> I suggest you don't do
> it - but if you want to do it, don't take out your frustrations on the
rest
> of the group.

For the last time; I haven't (and I wouldn't).

> Don't pretend you think Terry is God's Gift to Usenet (when
> everyone knows you don't),

I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt. You seem to forget I haven't
been around that long to know about everything what has been tried with Sky
earlier.

> and don't take cheap shots against other
> regulars.

It can hardly be seen as a "cheap shot" IMHO, for the reason that this would
indicate that my post was premeditated as some kind of vile attack (which it
definitely wasn't).

> Or if you do, be prepared to forfeit what Lady Ellen would call
> our cosy willingness to support our Inner Sanctum right or wrong.

I think I can set your mind at rest by saying that I don't take offense in
this latest fall from grace. Knowing my history here it was to be expected.

DLK

http://www.mybluenotes.tk


>
> John James (JJ)
>
>