Re: Perhaps Cele has a crush on Sky? was: Re: NEIL---SOC.MEN take note MORE RAPE TALK ON THE NEIL ARTHUR O'C

>"Cele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 18 Nov 2003 06:50:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sky King) wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>> >LOL.  You sure have not sounded like you have been having fun especially
>at
>> >my expense.  What fun are you talking about? Be SPECIFIC.
>>
>> Nah, can't be bothered. You're the only one I've been flaming back and
>> forth with, Sky. It's been a blast, but I've lost interest, as I said.
>
>You seem very fanatical to reply to nearly every post of Sky, for someone
>who's lost interest, Cele.
>
>> >No...they can judge by other posts that you have made and come to the
>same
>> >conclusion.  Don't blame me dear.
>> >chuckle
>>
>> Nobody's blaming you, Sky. You're not getting what I'm saying. It's my
>> posts to you which have been back and forth flame warring. And, of
>> course, yours to me, insofar as they achieve flame status. I haven't
>> engaged in that with anyone else, so if people are going to draw
>> conclusions about my participation in flame wars, they'd pretty much
>> have to draw 'em based on my posts to you.
>
>I know that Ellen has stated her opinion about your ongoing battle with Sky
>several times, and I must admit that I can go along with her view on certain
>things. It's not because you keep yourself together to everybody save for
>one, that you are guiltless of flaming. That said I'm the first to admit
>that flaming Sky doesn't *feel* wrong, yet if you're honest about it, it's
>just as intolerable as flaming the next guy or girl.
>
>[...]
>
>> >I thought it didn't bother you....at least that is what you told me.
>> >And a BIG CHUCKLE for you.
>>
>> It doesn't, Sky. If you read the comment over again slowly, you might
>> see that I said it could discourage *other* posters. I myself
>> obviously *do* have a teflon coating, or I'd've been long gone.
>
>I'm sure it does bother you (and as a matter of fact I *hope* it bothers
>you) since you spend so much time talking to Sky that it's almost
>embarrassing. So, personally, I believe that he *does* bother you OR perhaps
>you have a crush on him, or something.
>

David you are WAY out of line.


>> It's all about perspective. I have assigned your remarks exactly the
>> importance that they deserve...
>
>Sky's remarks must be immensely important then (see my remarks above and
>your countless posts addressing him).
>
>[...]
>
>> >God...next you girls will start a fire and chant, "we are the world."
>>
>> Are you deliberately excluding Daran, or are you unaware that you're
>> responding to *his* post, not mine?
>
>Perhaps you are disregarding the possibility that Sky was trying to be funny
>and thus deliberately has included Daran in the "you girls" group. His
>remark about "you girls starting a fire and chanting we are the world" was
>certainly funny to me ;-)
>
>DLK
>

Yeah I thought it was funny too, funny that he's so jealous.

Heather