Re: CHALLENGE FOR T.R. REGULARS

On 01 Nov 2003 20:02:45 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DEDHeather94)
wrote:

>>Sky King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>> I challenge all of the members of t.r. to try and debate me without
>>> ANY name calling...NONE.,....no calling people idiots or morons 
>>> or dykes and fags etc.  I bet that I will not be the first one to
>>> break the rule.  If I do I vow to leave t.r. and never return.  
>>> Any T.R. regular that does break the rule should also LEAVE.
>>> 
>>> I bet I get no takers on this.  I tried it before and they couldn't
>>> last.  So when the T.R. regulars talk about others calling them
>>> names you now know why.
>>> 
>>> We will see if there are any takers.  I bet some say they could
>>> care less about debating me or something similar.  The reality
>>> is that they know they cannot outlast me.
>>> 
>>> Put up or shut up folks. 
>>> CHUCKLE
>>
>>It would have helped here, SK, to post a topic about which t.r. lifers
>>could debate you. But I can't help but agree with your perception
>>about many of these folks. The MO among the regulars seems, often
>>enough, to be to first throw out some cheap shot blowoff response to a
>>newer poster. Then when they get the same in return, they all rally
>>together and declare other to be "compassionate", "caring", "loving",
>>"honest" in an extremely saccharine manner that resembles the
>>utterances of people whose friendships goes well beyond those of
>>strangers who post like-minded thoughts on USENET.


Any topic would be fine.
>>
>>It is a very strange lot indeed. I haven't figured it out, but perhaps
>>it is engendered by common horrific rape experiences or something like
>>that. I'm speculating here. I'm sure that you know much more about
>>this than I do, having been here longer.
>
>
>Keep it up Ellen.  You know, when you first started posting here I never
>considered you to be a troll, only a pompous windbag.  Annoying, but harmless. 
>Now your true colors are showing and they're very ugly.
>
>As for Sky King's "challenge", I suggest you google him if you have the
>stomach, and see his posting history here for yourself.  I don't need to say
>another word about that, especially if you take my advice, which I'm sure
>you're too haughty to even consider.  That's fine because I could care less
>about you or your opinions of us, but unless you do so you won't know the truth
>about our Sky King and anything you defer to him on will only make you look
>even more of a fool than you do already.
>
>It really amazes me, though, how you can find my posts so offensive and
>Laurie's reference to masturbation so offensive yet you converse (seriously at
>that) with someone who prides himself on how offensive he can possibly be, just
>for the fun of it.  But hey, please don't take my word for it.  It's all there
>if you care to see it.  My guess is you won't because you're really no better
>than Sky King is, you just use bigger words and leave off the chuckle.
>
>In short, you make me sick.
>
>Heather


Naw...that was something you ate.  I told you to now to swallow.
chuckle