Re: What has America lost?

Maybe in your mind. International observers say otherwise. No one od any 
other than extreme leftists proclivities have even bothered to question 
that one.
		
Brian Quincy Hutchings wrote:
> it's a lot of fun, to argue past one-another.  however,
> the perennial say-so about "the gassing of the Kurds
> by Saddamy" has been called into question, namely
> by the fact that it occured during a battle
> in the Iraq-Iran War -- and may just as well have
> been launched by the Iranian forces.
>     the fact is that Cheney is impeachable,
> due to his planning this war since '91, and
> using nine-one-one as a pretense (whether or not
> he was invloved in planning it, allowing it, or
> if it was just a SNAFU of impreparedness -- viz,
> "NORAD only looks outward;
> the FAA didn't notify us in time!")
>     I don't care to get into the various conspiracies/theories,
> because it is all so unneccesary.  as you can see form the timeline,
> http://larouchepub.com/pr/2003/031108timeline_ssci.html,
> all that is required is a pinkie's worth of pressure,
> on your congressperson over the holiday, and
> Trickier Dick will be old, bad history.
>     or, like the apocryphal statement of Churchill:
> Gentlemen, history will be very kind to us;
> we shall write it!...  so, it's your choice,
> 30-million dead Americans, or Trickier Dick --
> go with Feith's "special info office,"
> what ever it's called, and seal our fate in Blair's McCrusade.
>
> Don Swayser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>  
>
> > and deal with them scum. However if it was defacto under Husseins 
> > control they could have provoked another nerve agent attack Hussein was 
> > so fond of using against them. Now, that's clear enough even to someone 
>
>  
>
> > > The items listed in the classified annex were either raw reports or
> > > products of the CIA, the NSA, or, in one case, the DIA. The provision
> > > of the classified annex to the Intelligence Committee was cleared by
> > > other agencies and done with the permission of the Intelligence
> > > Community. The selection of the documents was made by DOD to respond
> > > to the Committee's question. The classified annex was not an analysis
> > > of the substantive issue of the relationship between Iraq and al
> > > Qaida, and it drew no conclusions.
> > >
> > > Individuals who leak or purport to leak classified information are
> > > doing serious harm to national security; such activity is deplorable
> > > and may be illegal.
>
>  
>
> >  "The Czech government notified the State Department in October 2001 
> > that its domestic security service, known by the acronym BIS, had 
> > monitored a meeting in Prague between Atta and al-Ani in April 2001 ? 
> > five months before the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks."
>
>  
>
> > Yes, and Winston Churchills assertions called "baseless" until 9/1/1939.
>
>
> --ils duces d'Enron!
> http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2003/031128_iraq_statement.html

--
If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an 
equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other.
Carl Schurz (1829-1906)