Re: Abortion

Chris wrote:
> "David V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > > Perhaps you'd be good enough to explain just what
> > > isn't true.
> >
> > Trying to explain something like that to someone like
> > you would be a waste of time. You already know your
> > statement was false, yet you persist.
>
> When you go calling someone a liar...

They more often are a liar than not.

> > > Your post implies first that American girls aren't 
> > > getting abortions
> >
> > There is no such implication, but you already knew
> > that.
>
> How in the hell would anyone other than you know what you
> imply in your statements?

No need to 'imply' anything. Just read.

> > > You're the one who stated that there are not enough 
> > > children available in this country to meet the demand
> > > for adoption.
> >
> > No I didn't, but you already knew that.
>
> If you really didn't

I didn't.

> > > Non-repsonsive[sic] aren't you?
> >
> > No, you just don't like my responses.
>
> Again, the commentary we'd expect of a child.

If you're going to flame, you need to do better than that.

> > > The U.S. mrder rate is lower than at any time since
> > > the death penalty was banned.
> >
> > Sure, but take the rest of society into consideration
> > and the connection disappears.
>
> Take what exactly into consideration?

Reality.
--
David V.
Yosemite Llama Ranch

UDP for WebTV