Re: What has America lost?

it's a lot of fun, to argue past one-another.  however,
the perennial say-so about "the gassing of the Kurds
by Saddamy" has been called into question, namely
by the fact that it occured during a battle
in the Iraq-Iran War -- and may just as well have
been launched by the Iranian forces.
    the fact is that Cheney is impeachable,
due to his planning this war since '91, and
using nine-one-one as a pretense (whether or not
he was invloved in planning it, allowing it, or
if it was just a SNAFU of impreparedness -- viz,
"NORAD only looks outward;
the FAA didn't notify us in time!")
    I don't care to get into the various conspiracies/theories,
because it is all so unneccesary.  as you can see form the timeline,
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2003/031108timeline_ssci.html,
all that is required is a pinkie's worth of pressure,
on your congressperson over the holiday, and
Trickier Dick will be old, bad history.
    or, like the apocryphal statement of Churchill:
Gentlemen, history will be very kind to us;
we shall write it!...  so, it's your choice,
30-million dead Americans, or Trickier Dick --
go with Feith's "special info office,"
what ever it's called, and seal our fate in Blair's McCrusade.

Don Swayser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
 
> and deal with them scum. However if it was defacto under Husseins 
> control they could have provoked another nerve agent attack Hussein was 
> so fond of using against them. Now, that's clear enough even to someone 
 
>  > The items listed in the classified annex were either raw reports or
>  > products of the CIA, the NSA, or, in one case, the DIA. The provision
>  > of the classified annex to the Intelligence Committee was cleared by
>  > other agencies and done with the permission of the Intelligence
>  > Community. The selection of the documents was made by DOD to respond
>  > to the Committee's question. The classified annex was not an analysis
>  > of the substantive issue of the relationship between Iraq and al
>  > Qaida, and it drew no conclusions.
>  >
>  > Individuals who leak or purport to leak classified information are
>  > doing serious harm to national security; such activity is deplorable
>  > and may be illegal.
 
>   "The Czech government notified the State Department in October 2001 
> that its domestic security service, known by the acronym BIS, had 
> monitored a meeting in Prague between Atta and al-Ani in April 2001 ? 
> five months before the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks."
 
>  Yes, and Winston Churchills assertions called "baseless" until 9/1/1939.

--ils duces d'Enron!
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2003/031128_iraq_statement.html