
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> T.Carr allegedly said:
>
> >
> >> Sorry......I should have said:
> >>
> >> "Yet the first time they get control of both houses of Congress in
> >> decades without a Democrat president to veto their bills, they spend the
> >> house out!!!"
> >
> >
> > Just like 1993-94..only a different party was in power
>
> They didn't spend the house out. Clinton was moving toward
> surpluses.....and got there.
Really?
Lets look at the historical data
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2004/pdf/hist.pdf
(section 1.2 , pg 28)
Deficit as a % of GDP
1993 3.9% (Clintons First Budget)
1994 2.9%
1995 2.2% (GOP Congress, Tax cut enacted)
1996 1.4%
1997 0.3%
It wasnt until the GOP Congress was elected that the deficits were
eliminated. Hell Clinton didnt have a clue to when/if the budget would
be belanced until the mid 1990's. He kept predicting 10 years, 8
years, etc.. until the budget would be balanced
But since you want to give him all the credit, I'll ask you for a
few policy/legislative actions he initiatied to warrant event a
significant fraction of the credit. I'll even help you
1) Budget act of 1993
2)
3)
4)
5)
>
> Bush.....he's a disaster in almost every policy area....running the largest
> deficit ever.......and for what?
The larest deficit in non inflation adjusted $. For What? For what
the voters claim they want..something for nothing. Pork filled farm
bills, DOD contracts in thier home districts, "feel good" social
programs, etc...
>
> Not health or education or better roads.....
Apparently you are not keeping up on current events. A major ($400B)
program was passed to help seniors with drugs, and the funding on
infrastructure was also increased
T.Carr
>
> Just war.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |