Re: "smoked salmon socialists"

"Jeffraham Prestonian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Rubystars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > Secondly, that was 2/24/01. That was far in advance of 9/11/01. The
sense
> of
> > urgency was much increased after that. We could no longer safely pursue
a
> > policy
> > of containing these tyrants, but we had to take a more active role to be
> > effective.
> >
> > Colin Powell seems to have understood that.
>
> Understood that it didn't matter who we
> invaded -- as long as it drew attention away
> from Osama bin Missin'?

Actually when 9/11 happened the first person I thought was behind this was
Saddam, and that turned out not to be true. However, that doesn't mean he
didn't pose a threat to us. You can't seem to understand that it's no longer
safe to let these kinds of situations fester and get worse and worse and
then become an attack like 9/11.

> No WMD, No al Qaeda, No Bush in 2004. You
> will see.

Chemicals have been found, other things have been found too. The war's not
even over yet. I hope you're wrong about 2004, because a Democrat would
probably pull our troops out of Iraq and then the Iraqi people WOULD hate us
for running out on them before they were standing on their own feet.

-Rubystars