Re: "smoked salmon socialists"

"Rubystars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

> > Who says Islamic extremists ( violent ones) are good?
>
> Any time the U.S. does anything to neutralize the threat they pose, the
> liberals are unhappy about it.

In re: Iraq, current tactics there are having quite
the opposite effect. The previous tactics were
working much better, by keeping a balance rather
than creating anarchy for months (and thus insuring
that whatever banned weapons that MAY have
existed in Iraq got spread to the four corners).
All this, while our troops guarded the Oil Ministry
grounds in Baghdad.

So you see, no one thinks going after bad guys is
a bad idea -- the disagreement comes in the targets
and methodology. Even though a hammer is a good
construction tool, hitting yourself in the head with it,
or smacking a bunch of boards at random isn't
addressing any kind of housing shortage.

They want you to believe they never said it was
about WMD or the threat Iraq was to the U.S.,
but they DID say that. Then, their actions on the
ground showed little regard for finding WMD. So,
why did we go?  Was it faith-based intelligence?  :)

-- 
Toucan
Be heard. Spread the word.
http://www.YouSaidit.org
An experiment in hypermedia Democracy