
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Daniel T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:postmaster- > That works both ways doesn't it. Why can a woman get an abortion and you > don't say "she should have used better precautions" but the man is > forced to pay a 18 year burden based on a decision the woman makes > without having to consult him at all? And then you say "he should have > used better precautions"... > > The fact is, if either of them don't want the child, then they both > should have used better precautions. But they didn't, so now what? I think its the responsibility of both parties to discuss what would happen if they would have a pregnancy BEFORE having sex. And yes, if the woman doesn't want a child, she needs to take precautions. And if the man doesn't want a child then HE needs to take precautions. > IMO if only one of the parents is willing to bear the burden, then the > fetus should be brought to term and the willing parent should get full > custody, while the other parent should be shut out of the child's life. > No support, no visitation, nothing. I could see having the father give > the mother some sort of birthing fee for her efforts though. Poor kids.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |