Re: Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!

Harry Krause wrote:

> Jonathan Ball wrote:
>
> > Don Bruder wrote:
> >
> >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Harry Krause wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > > We haven't bought anything at Wal-Mart in years. It is among the most
> > > > > exploitative employers in the United States, a real rogue corporation,
> > > > > that screws its workers and its suppliers at every opportunity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wal-Mart, if you will, treats its employees as if they were Iraqis.
> > > >
> > > > If their employees are being treated as badly as you say, why is it that
> > > > no union has been able to organize them?
> > > >
> > > > Don
> > >
> > >
> > > Because Wal-Mart Inc. has a carved-in-stone anti-union stance. They will 
> > > (and have, multiple times) fired everybody on the payroll and shut down 
> > > the entire store rather than allow a union to get so much as a toenail 
> > > clipping (never mind a foot...) in the door.
> >
> > Prove it.
> >
> > Federal law mandates union certification elections, if 
> > enough employees ask for one.
>
>
>
> hahahahahahohohohohohhehehehehe
>
> This government is about as anti-union as Wal-Mart.

Non sequitur.  Wal-Mart must hold a union certification 
election if enough employees ask for one.  Their 
anti-union stance doesn't enter into it.

> The "law" has been
> looking the other way for the last three years, for the most part.

Prove it, liar.