Re: No Genius Left Behind

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:
> 
> Herman Rubin wrote:
> >
> > I do not think that all expense here is needed or justified.
> > However, we need it down to a much lower level than 160.  If
> > we want competent teachers, physicians, etc., for the next
> > generation, we will need to get it well below the genius
> > level, as we need those who can do similar things year after
> > year.
>
> Absolutely, most teachers are only 110-130 IQ. The IQ 160 genius is
> only 1 in 200 or 300 people.

The IQ-160's are the folks who are going to make the Nobel Prize
winning breakthroughs that seriously improve society: Cure cancer,
make fusion power work, stop the OzoneHole and GlobalWarming,
save species extinction, reclaim toxic waste, improve crop yields,
to name a few.  

That's why it is so important that No_Geniuses are overlooked in 
the *Insane_Quest* spending Billion$$$ to see that every IQ-75 
Retarded Gork LOOZer makes some minimum score on the latest 
standardized test, between gruntz and twitchez...(NCLB).