
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hanover Fist) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Gifted kids are better served by increased teacher vigilance than they > would be by increased funding. With teachers acting as "flame-spotters" to notice the gifted kids? That's an excellent idea. It also saves teachers the time and trouble of having to teach/mentor them, and instead concentrate on others more their speed. > There are a number of academics and > professionals out there who would like nothing better than to mentor > gifted children while on their spare time, and watchful teachers could > link such kids up with these professionals. Sounds like a very efficient solution. Everyone wins. > If a database of approved > individuals were made available, this could be a safe and effective > alternative to throwing a lot of money at what you see as a problem. Of course, the public school authorities might object - even though it removes a possibly "bratty, snotty, disruptive" smart kid out of the assembly line into a more effective environment.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |