Re: Liberals are weird!

Server 13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:42:30 -0800, "JoettaB"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>"Grizzlie Antagonist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>>On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:37:45 -0800, "JoettaB"
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"Grizzlie Antagonist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> >>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>-
> >>
> >>>>-----------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>>http://www.drudgereport.com/matthb.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>>HOLLYWOOD DEMS GATHER FOR 'HATE BUSH' MEETING AT HILTON
> >>>>
> >>>>Can you imagine a that? A Hollywood gathers of democrats? Democrats that
> >>>>hate Bush? WOW... such news.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>><snip>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>That's my question.  What's it all about?
> >>
> >>Who cares? Do Democrats question all Republican meetings or get togethers?
> >>Can't Hollywood have some Democrats as well as Republican actors? It's
> >>exactly what it is:  a group of Hollywood Democratic actors having a meeting
> >>to discuss how they hate Bush. It is no different than a group of Hollywood
> >>Republican actors getting together with Ah-nold to discuss how much they
> >>love Bush.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > My question remains unanswered:  Why does the Left HATE Bush, as
> > opposed to merely disagreeing with him?  You do understand the
> > difference between those two concepts, don't you?
> 
> 
>    I hate Bush because he does everything he can get away with to distort, 
> disrupt, and outright prevent the functioning of American government and then 
> pretends he's a good American.
> 
>    Lying to the American people about what harm the things he insists on doing 
> in secret over their dead bodies will do to them runs a close second.
> 
>    Then, of course, there's his inaction on border control, funding to first 
> responders, planning the war, working for a real coalition, and spreading the 
> load in Iraq beyond his contractor buddies, all while pretending to be a real CinC.
> 
>    And let's not forget the tainted SEC appointees, the unprecedented number of 
> appointees from one company (Enron), and the intentional monkeywrenching of 
> every congressional investigation he can screw up, from securities fraud to 9/11.
> 
>    Which is of course understandable, since Rumsfeld cancelled the weapons 
> programs and placements Clinton set up to get Bin Laden and denied 880 million 
> in antiterrorism money, and Bush's people made sure every pre-9/11 report with a 
> Clinton staffer's name on it sat around on someone's desk till the buildings 
> fell - thus as good as causing 9/11 in the first place.
> 
>    Add the totally transparent lies told repeatedly by his advisors on national 
> TV, and his own lies, of course, which led up to this totally irrelevant and 
> fruitless war which will gain this nation nothing at all, and you have an 
> unbeatable package for hate.
> 
>    HTH.



Where did you learn your history from, the walls of a toilet stall?
Cite your evidence that any of the above statements are true. Don't
stand back and spout your opinion as if it is fact.

You mention Clinton. Is this the same guy who professed in the belief
of family values and then played "hide the cigar" with an intern? Is
it the Clinton who while on national televison, lied about almost
everything he was asked?

Get real. 

If you think there has ever been a President in office that didn't pad
his method of leadership by moving the chips to his side of the table,
then you are either niave or under 10 years old.

Answer the mans question and quit trying to baffle us with bullshit.