Re: I Don't Hate Bush, I Just Hate His Policies

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 "righter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> WRONG AGAIN.  There is a fifty-fifty split in this country.  The DIFFERENCE
> is that you right wingnuts WHINE AND WHINE, all the time.  You listen to
> talk radio, you sign petitions, you LIE like there's no tomorrow, you do the
> work of two liberals each, and then YOU GET YOUR WAY, with, heh, heh, a
> little help from your cheatin' politicians.  I'm pissed off at both parties,
> but I know whom the greater evil is.  Is it worth it, as you deny?  HELL
> YES.  Half the left wing constituency is asleep.  If they ever wake up from
> their ignorant bliss, your criminal politicians will be SHITASS out of LUCK.
> Eat THAT with your pork and beans, oh right wing piece of crappe.

The non-participants are pissed with both parties. Republicans are the 
extremists and Democrats are the true conservatives. They resist change. 
And clearly they're not an effective front to a highly motivated 
Republican party. They are complicit in Iraq, and the formation of a 
truly ineffective homeland security feel good solution instead of real 
border security.

I do not see the non-participants as left wing however. I think they 
lean largely to the left, but in certain aspects such as social programs 
associated with the left, they see them as making people more dependent 
on government and not expecting enough personal responsibility from 
them. I have no problem with progressive taxation and a certain amount 
of wealth redistribution for citizens. But I have major problems with 
making people dependent on such systems, and the vast amoung of waste 
government management brings to such systems. I don't like the complete 
lack of expecting people to be responsible for themselves while 
collecting public assistance when they are able to do so.

I see a fundamental disconnect between the offerings of the two parties 
that has disenfranchised the silent majority in the country.

Chris