Re: (Free Tibet) Why Tibet??

The reality is that that 'westworld'...and the maoists were/are just
doing 'their dirty work ' for them. ...is a 'construct' of ritual
racist child abuse.

Tribal socities, have inherently a belief in and respect for the
living reality fo the sacred mother goddess....which is
programmed/brainwashed out by the influence of the ritual racist child
abusers. (a anti tribal, anti female goddess pyscopathy that calls
itself christianity)...yes these abusive secret rituals really are the
way this paradym is CONSTRUCTED.

....the manifestation of these rituals are the destruction/rape of the
mother goddess and the destruction of tribal
societies/realities....thge way emmisions are increasing, it will be
like chain reaction, running out of control...overheating..panicking
westerners/unbelievers as temeratures hit the boiling point ov water.
this is a reality, not fiction....this is the western (plus imitators)
trip. I (we) know here in bloody blighty.

In a sense the commies in Tibet are naive, but pathetic also ... to
hide behind anti western arisorcracy/imperialism in there faulty
analysis of The Tibetan senario...however the Free Tibet Campaign DOES
NOT AID THIS by insisting on calling the Tibetan tribal leadreship
'aristorcracy' and 'Royalty'...the reality is that this order, these
people, in the west are vampires.

Thus this (western type) reality is fucked...one way or the
other...either as the new age prophites, including the Dalai Lama, say
that there will be a break in this order both on a individual and
collective basis, and thus a total change in reality, or,
alternatively if this TOTALLY INSANE (ids) order maintains its fear
power grip for long enough, then before any transformation as
described happens, their will be a destruction (purification) of
'westernworld' (etc),...as many native american traditionals
prohecise...I'm hedging my bets by (at theis present time)..looking
for a remote mountain property.

In other words, maoists, you are agents of the western ritualsistic
abusers.

OM SHIVA!

King Amdo





Pilar Quezzaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> In soc.culture.hongkong Sigmund I. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> : I beg to differ. Tibet is the site of an ancient culture with no 
> : militaristic allure and based on theological values that stress 
> : spiritual self-improvement. It is easy to feel simpathy for this type of 
> : culture, and is equally easy to feel the sadness of seeing modern 
> : society, be it communism or social capitalism :-), steamrolling it all. 
> 
> As much as I would like to agree with you, this is a very inaccurate 
> picture of Tibet's history. The theocracy has a history of violence 
> against its population and foreign invasion. Tibet is no different in that 
> regard from any other part of Asia. Its isolation didn't allow for great 
> expansion, nor did its population swell to require conquest. 
> 
> : This simpathy is immaterial to the inevitability of the development, and 
> : there is no doubt in my mind that chinese will "win" and propel Tibet in 
> : the developed world all the same.
> 
> You act as if that's bad. What's bad is that it's being done at the cost 
> of the culture, and under oppressive conditions. A modern Tibet is not 
> inadvisable, in fact, it could prove an excellent social experiment. 
> Perhaps I am influenced -- I've heard the Dalai Lama speak at MIT about 
> the connections between faith and neurology recently. He's a highly 
> "modern" guy, and whatever you think of his politics, he's a marvelous 
> blend of the old and the new. 
> 
> : It remembers me the native american cultures being steamrolled by the 
> : american expansion: you cannot help feeling simpathy for the native 
> : american way of life, even though it is clear that there is no room for 
> : that in the new world.
> 
> *eyeroll* The Plains Indians in particular were some of the most
> conflict-driven, violent groups in the world. Whites conquered them in
> part because they were fighting amongst themselves. Let's not sugarcoat
> and baby-ize these cultures, or put them on some sort of pedestal. Their
> oppression is sufficient to feel sorry -- they don't need to be
> represented as naive on top of that. That's just as racist as calling them 
> backward -- it's an imbalanced view.