Re: Tibetans fear $3.2 billion railroad is being built at their expense

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guardiangel) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas J Wheat) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guardiangel) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas J Wheat) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guardiangel) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > Read this article carefully or you will be brainwashed
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas J Wheat) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL 
> > > > > PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > > Tibetans fear $3.2 billion railroad is being built at their expense 
> > > > > > Los Angeles Times 
> > > > > > http://www.charleston.net/stories/110703/wor_07tibet.shtml
> > > > > > LHASA, TIBET--Beijing's plan to pacify this restive Himalayan province
> > > > > > involves a $3.2 billion railroad that will connect the rest of China
> > > > > > to the frozen Tibetan plateau known as the roof of the world.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The railroad, billed as the world's highest and due to be completed in
> > > > > > 2007, represents the linchpin of China's ambitious "Go West" campaign
> > > > > > to develop and repopulate its impoverished hinterland.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But Tibetans opposed to Chinese control say the railroad's
> > > > > > construction, which began last year, has so far confirmed their worst
> > > > > > fears: that the train, although it may usher in rapid progress, will
> > > > > > transform Tibet's desolate nomadic culture into a land of
> > > > > > inequalities.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "We went to inquire about railroad jobs but they said it's all been
> > > > > > taken," said Tenzin, a 22-year-old Tibetan farmer from Gansu
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > "Tibetans opposed to Chinese control"? And now the "reporter" is
> > > > > quoting some word from a person who is from Gansu Province instead of
> > > > > Tibet! Most of the Singaporeans[78%]are ethnic Chinese, but people
> > > > > won't call them "Chinese"
> > > > > 
> > > > > Obviously, it is misleading..
> > > > This still does not obscure the fact that the majority of jobs some
> > > > 85% have gone to Han chinese. Why not hire more tibetans to build the
> > > > railroad. Supposedly its being built for their benefit.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > not a single evidence existed when the ethnic background(i.e. being
> > > Tibetans) is the reason of being rejected to the jobs
> > prove it! You don't think I am going to take you at your word. How
> > could you know? You probably have never been to Tibet let alone be
> > capable of sympathising with Tibetans undergoing occupation.
> 
> 
> 
> You ask me to prove/show something which doesn't exist? What kind of
> logic is it? Dont waste time, come and prove the existence of such
> "Ethnic-oriented" employment situation.

the proof is as we americans like to say is in the pudding. Its
blatantly obvious that there is ethnic discrimination. That's why they
have hired a disproportionate number of ethnic chinese to build the
railroad. Also I asked you first. The burden of proof is on you.
> 
> 
> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > >, formerly
> > > > > > part of Tibet, but now a Chinese province.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > China's control over Kansu predated the existence the first
> > > > > proto-Tibetan state. How come Kansu was "formerly part of Tibet"?
> > > > > 
> > > > > "historical differences and current political realities make the
> > > > > creation of a Greater Tibet extremely improbable, at least initially"
> > > > > --Goldstein, Tibetologist from CWRU, "The Snow Lion and the Dragon"
> > > > > 
how about a page number for this quote
> > > > > 
> > > > > >"We've been here four
> > > > > > months and we can't find anything. We're willing to be waiters,
> > > > > > security guards, tour guides, anything. But no one wants us."
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The Chinese seem to have an extra edge. That's because education and
> > > > > > the ability to speak Mandarin Chinese are the basic criteria for most
> > > > > > jobs.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > "Quality Control", no big deal!
> > > > Sounds like han chauvenisim and exclusivisim. AQdmit it you think
> > > > Chinese are better than Tibetans.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > read the original msg you post, the Gansu boy is a FARMER, and we/they
> > > need well-trained/skilled people. Heartfully, I myself won't hire a
> > > FARMER for my house's interior design...
> > I am sure you don't need much training to drive a railroad spike into
> > a rail. You swing a hammer and drive the spike in the rail. You just
> > have to be able to work hard. Also this is just one farmer I am sure
> > thousands of Tibetans could capably do the work. Here again you are
> > showing your racist nature when you say the Tibetans aren't capable of
> > building railroads.
> 
> 
> I'm talking about the Gansu "FARMER". Are all Tibetans farmers? You
> tell me.
> 
no but alot of them want to work at building the qinghai railroad.
> 
> > > 
> > > Needless to say the **railway system**
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Tibetans have fought for preservation of their culture since China
> > > > > > annexed their homeland in 1951.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since the year of 1914 the Tibetans has clearly reaffirmed their
> > > > > homeland as part of China.
> > > > No china never signed the Simla treaty. They were only witnesses to
> > > > it.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The Tibetans signed it. I said "THE TIBETANS"
> >  The treaty was null and void because china never signed it.
> 
> 
> I am talking about the Tibetans' attutude, not the legality of this
> treaty. BTW, both Lochen Shartra and Chen I-Fan signed the 7-point
> "Schedule". And in 1934 they reaffirmed such status.
> 
please cite source for this. 
> 
>  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > International attention has been drawn
> > > > > > to their independence movement by the Dalai Lama, the exiled spiritual
> > > > > > leader driven from here in 1959 when the Chinese crushed a failed
> > > > > > uprising.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The Dalai Lama has repeatedly spoken out against what he calls a
> > > > > > cultural genocide by Chinese occupiers in Tibet. Beijing considers the
> > > > > > Nobel laureate a separatist bent on breaking up the nation. Chinese
> > > > > > authorities have banned his portrait here.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But many Tibetans secretly display his image in their homes and pray
> > > > > > to him.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Beijing has tried to squelch the independence movement by pumping in
> > > > > > cash. It poured as much as $1.6 billion into the Tibetan economy last
> > > > > > year alone, which officials say represented the largest investment in
> > > > > > any province.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "Tibet's stability is China's stability. Tibet's development is
> > > > > > China's development," said Xiangba Pingcuo, Tibet's governor.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Beijing says the railroad is the economic salvation Tibet needs.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "Tibet is the only province without a rail link. The people of Tibet
> > > > > > want development. The railroad is the hope of everybody here," said
> > > > > > Tajie, the deputy mayor of Lhasa.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The Chinese who live here feel they would be the main beneficiaries.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "They're probably building the railroad for us," said Chen Yajun, 32,
> > > > > > a taxi driver from central China's Sichuan province. "It'll be easier
> > > > > > and cheaper to go home."
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Some of the train's first passengers will probably be its Chinese
> > > > > > construction workers. Of the 38,000 hired for the job, only 6,000 are
> > > > > > Tibetans. The rest were trucked in from inland provinces. Semi-skilled
> > > > > > employees make as much as 11 times more money than manual laborers.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > None of the 2,700 workers who operate heavy equipment or hold
> > > > > > supervisory jobs is Tibetan, according to Huang Difu, an official in
> > > > > > charge of the project.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Among the biggest losers of this lopsided gold rush are Tibetans
> > > > > > hoping for a share of the riches transforming their city.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "I feel sad for Tibet," said Jonu, a 19-year-old Tibetan who came to
> > > > > > pray at the Johkang temple. "So many Chinese are coming."
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Lhasa already has the look and feel of a Chinese city, with
> > > > > > Chinese-style buildings 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Han/Chinese-style building has appeared in Tibet for hundreds of year.
> > > > > For example, the golden roof of the wellknown Potala Palace was
> > > > > designed by the artists sent by the Chinese emperors. Generally,
> > > > > Tibetan customs/culture/arts is historically and heavily influenced by
> > > > > that of the Han Chinese[Norwich, 'Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of
> > > > > the Arts',1990]
> > > > You are wrong you are suggesting that there is no Tibetan style only a
> > > > homogenous Han Chinese style.
> > > 
> > > who said they should have no Tibetan-style building? If you're
> > > speechless please dont put your non-sense words into my mouth.  Han
> > > Culture and Tibetan culture are historically affected by each
> > > other,[e.g. Calendar: Twelve animals...etc]
> > The Tibetan calender is different from the chinese calender. They use
> > different animals. 
> 
> 
> what different anumals? Show us with quoted reference/sources.
> 
> [I can show you NOW in Tibetan -- Byi, Glang, Stag, Yos, Hbrug, Sprul,
> Rta, Lug, Sprel, Bya, Khyi, Phag]
> 
I assume this is the english translation of what you wrote in Tibetan.
rat, ox, tiger, rabbit, dragon, snake, horse, sheep, monkey, bird,
dog, pig,
Also
tibetan new year has a different date then the chinese new year,
Tibetan new year is feburary 21st, chinese new year is january 22.
Obviously they use different dating methods. So their calenders are
different.
> 
> 
> Also Art historians around the world have
> > identified a unique architectural style that is classically Tibetan
> > and distinct from Chinese.
> 
> 
> Art Historians around the world? Quote what they all said to support
> your wild claims. As "Oxford Encyclopedia of the Arts" points out,
> Han/Chinese culture HEAVILY influences that of the Tibetans. It means
> the development of Tibetan arts/culture is hardly independent. Even a
> strong TI supporter was forced to admit:
> 
> "We may in fact say that the present civilization of Tibet is taken
> mainly from China and only to a lesser degree from India. The general
> appliances of civilization...have come from China"
> --Charles Bell, 13th DL's chief foreign advisor, "Tibet: Past and
> Present"
a page number would help here. Also it may say that Tibetans may have
utilized chinese technology that doesn't mean that they didn't have a
indigenous style all their own. even you admit Tibet was independant
from 1st century b.c. until the Yuan dynasty. Don't you think they
would have developed their own unique style.
>
 Let me give you an example. The Tibetan Chorten has  a slight
resemblance to a nepali Stupa, and definetly does not resemble a
chinese pagoda. What do you have to say about that. Another example is
the Potala palace, it is also built in the Tibetan style.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Here again your Han Chauvenisim is blurring
> > the distinction between two seperate cultures.
> 
> 
<snip>
> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > You are wrong. The modern architecture
> > > > going up in Lhasa is neither classical chinese or Tibetan
> > > > architecture, rather postmodern trash.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > As you said it is "postmodern". Tibet seems to be **westernized**
> > > instead of "Sinicized". Sinicization has appeared for hundreds of year
> > By post modern i mean the style of architecture is neither classical
> > chinese or Tibetan, rather a conflagaration of billboards and neon
> > sighns which did by the way originate in the West.
> 
> 
> Not sign shows that it is exclusive in China
can you clarify what you have written here.
> 
> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > and Chinese billboards proliferating across
> > > > > > town. More than half the 200,000 residents here are believed to be
> > > > > > Chinese. Even the main boulevard in front of the Dalai Lama's holy
> > > > > > Potala Palace is named Beijing Road.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Beijing control over Tibet[1288-present] predated the existence of the
> > > > > first Dalai Lama, Dge-'dun grub, [1391-1474]
> > > > Wrong it was the mongols who had control at that time not the Chinese.
> > > > When are the chinese going to learn that the Yuan dynasty was a mongol
> > > > foreign control over china.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ignorant. Similar to the Qing rulers, Kubilai Khan claimed himself as
> > > the Emperor of China, he adopted the dynastic name of Yuan (as well as
> > > the Han/Chinese traditional government system) claiming himself the
> > > legitimate ruler following the previous SuiTang/Sung Dynasties.
> > > Everybody regarded "Yuan" as one of the (greatest) 26 dynasties of
> > > China. <Even the official title of Phagspa, Tibet's local ruler, was
> > > "Great Yuan Imperial Tutor>
> > Kublai Khan was a mongol. A mongol from Mongolia (a internationally
> > recognized sovereign independant country)
> 
> 
> Inner Mongolia, where most of the Mongols live in, is now part of
> China
> 
Yes because of the imperialism of Joseph Stalin inner mongolia is now
part of china.
> 
> > conquered China in 1288
> 
> 
> 1288? Are you sure? 
oops, 1279.
> 
> 
> > does
> > not mean that China can lay claim to Mongolia on the basis of of
> > Mongol conquest.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > It is ludicrous and faulty logic to suppose that this
> > was a sinicized dynasty.
> 
> 
> How ludicrous/faulty? Manchurian's invasion of China integrated
> Manchria into China. Its called Han assimiliation.
>
The qing dynasty while it lasted was a foreign dynasty. China proper,
Han chinese were subjugated by foreign rulers that had previously
never been under Han control. All of the top Qing bureacrats were
Manchurian. With the fall of the dynasty and the establishment of the
republic then China could lay claim to this area, only because she had
the force of arms and the will to conquer.
Also by the same fact that Mongolia is independant today and has not
been assimilated by the Han.
> 
> >The mongols may have used the chinese
> > governmental system however that system had the majority of governors
> > and top level administrators were Mongol and not chinese. Chinese
> > bureacrats during the Yuan dynasty were low man on the totem pole.
> > Face it it the Yuan was a period of foreign control over China.
> 
> 
> These elements match the case of Qing dynasty. We all, even in
> international treaties, regards Qing as "China".
The manchus at that time prior to invasion in 1644 were not regarded
as one of the races of chinese.
> 
> 
> > Tibet
> > may have been part of Mongolia at this time not china. China was part
> > of Mongolia at this time.
> 
> 
> In the Yuan Dynasty, Monglia, namely "Lingbei(Mountain-North)
> Province", was one of the 11 Provinces, directly ruled by Central
> Government in Dadu/Beijing. It is similar with Qing dynasty. Kubilai
> Khan ruled Mongolia from beijing not from
All of Kublai Khan's bureacrats, at least the top levels were mongols
not chinese.
> 
> 
> > > 
> > > As I've said before, you can be a Chinese["People of China"] without
> > > being a Han. There are Mongol-ruled China, Tibetan-ruled China,
> > > Manchu-ruled China and Han-ruled China thru out the five thousand
> > > years of Chinese history. And the term "China/Chinese/Zhongguo" means
> > > "Central State", hardly a term exclusive for any ethnic groups
> >  the Xia were Huns not Tibetans.
> 
> 
> Read more books, the founders of West Xia, the Qiang nationality,
> moved from SW the Tibetan plateau, not the north. There was even no
> "Hun" political entity groups appearing within the area of China.
> "Hun" has became then-Mongols
i found this Xia site on the internet I think you should have a look.
It says that the Xia spoke a proto- Tibetan Burman dialect, a language
called Tangut and that they may be related to Tibetans they were a
seperate nationality  more related to the Qiang.
http://www.uglychinese.org/xixia.htm
> 
> 
<snip>
> 
> 
> > > 
> > > "Tibet's status has been intertwined with China since the 7th century
> > > through marriages, wars, and treaties. Mongol conquests in the 13th
> > > century made Tibet part of a Mongol-ruled Chinese state, and four
> > > centuries later the ethnic Manchu Qing dynasty further incorporated
> > > Tibet into China"
> > > --A. Tom Grunfeld, Tibetologist from SUNY, "Reassessing Tibet Policy",
> > > 2000
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Even Chinese tourists, who come here expecting to see exotic Tibetan
> > > > > > faces and snowcapped mountains, shake their heads in disbelief when
> > > > > > they see the new Lhasa.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "The tour guide told us about 80 percent of the people living here now
> > > > > > are Chinese and most of them are from Sichuan," said Liu Fuyou, 50, a
> > > > > > tourist from the coastal city of Tianjin wearing a straw cowboy hat.
> > > > > > "This is no longer Lhasa city, Tibet province. This is Lhasa city,
> > > > > > Sichuan province!"
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > As the Chinese thrive, raking in cash, the Tibetans seem to flounder.
> > > > > > At the Lhasa night market, all but one of the vendors are Chinese.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "Four years ago about 30 percent of us were Tibetan. Now we are the
> > > > > > only one left," said Ciren Zhuoma, 37, sitting in front of her small
> > > > > > shop selling Pepsi T-shirts and Budweiser baseball caps. Her voice is
> > > > > > barely audible above the piercing sound of live Chinese opera nearby.