Iraq unable to have democracy & why SH needed to be brutal to hold the place together

You know, when you read everything about SH from western presses, they
never say anything good about SH. Never. Especially when you read or
hear what Mr. Bush says about SH. I do not know about you, but I was
taught and I learned that there is some "good" in everyone and
everything, even though the majority or preponderance is evil. Yes,
there was a bit of good in SH. I believe it is the fact that the only
way to glue together or hold together a country like Iraq of its 3 or
4 or 5 or higher number of ethnic cultures into one country was to be
as brutal as SH was. And now that the brutality has disappeared from
Iraq, that it will go its "natural route of political evolution" and
that is to dissolve or disintegrate or fracture into 3 or 4 or 5
separate countries. Democracy is a poor glue to holding together
diverse peoples. USSR busted up. Yugoslavia busted up.

I have already made one analogy to the prematureness of democracy for
Iraq.

(1) Democracy for Iraq is like expecting and taking a 2 month old baby
and wanting it to ride a tricycle when it cannot even crawl or walk.

But I should make more such analogies because the USA administration
is a rather dumb one and never gets the message until it is too late.

(2) Democracy for Iraq is like trying to swim upstream of the Tigris
Euphrates River at 1 kilometer per hour when the current is 1.2
kilometers per hour against you.

(3) Democracy for Iraq is like drilling a child to be a doctor or
scientist before the child even has an education.

(4) Democracy for Iraq is like going to the dentist to have teeth
drilled before those teeth even have any decay.

(5) Democracy for Iraq is like expecting to have children and raise a
family before ever getting legally married.

(6) Democracy for Iraq is like having prostate surgery before being
"certain" that you really had prostate cancer.

(7) Democracy for Iraq is like buying a car before even getting a
drivers license.

(8) Democracy for Iraq is like going on a spending spree without
making sure that the money is first in the bank.

(9) Democracy for Iraq is like going on realestate shopping when you
do not even have the money to afford such.

The above analogies address the prematureness of Democracy for Iraq. I
believe Iraq can have a democracy in about 50 years hence and only
after it is split up into 3 or 4 tinier countries.

The example of Democracies created in many other countries of the
recent past implies that it is too difficult if not impossible to have
a democracy in a land where several ethnic groups co-exist.

There is a mathematical equation that the brutality of a regime equals
or exceeds the amount of ethnic diversity in order to hold together or
glue together those groups. Democracy, unlike dictatorships, is not
enough of a glue to hold together diverse ethnic groups and therefore
they splinter, shatter and bust apart. Iraq by 2005 will be another
Yugoslavia.

The savvy political pundit should now be thinking of various names for
the various countries that will mushroom out of Iraq. Kurdistan is one
name. Bagdadistan is another name. Sunistan is another name for the
many various new countries to form from the old Iraq.

Trouble here is also who gets the prize oilfields.

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies