Re: This is the future of mankind anyway

I would not worry too much about how many people vote.  When times are okay
people tend to let the other guy do it (not bother voting)  but when the
elected officials screw things up (see Calif) people rise to the occassion
and get their butts off the couch and do whats necessary.  Sometimes they
are right sometimes wrong but hey thats the "wil of the people."


"Aleksandar Sarovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Tick-Tock Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > How do you propose to have everyone voting?
> > force them?
> > Right now in the Democracies only a tiny porcentage of people bother to
> > vote.That means that only that tiny porcentage will have a saying in the
> > decision ,making process,thus creating an "elite" that would vote for
> their
> > own benefit,the end result will be the same as always,a minority
deciding
> > the course of humankind and we already have that ,don`t you think?
>
>
> People do not vote today because they are more and more aware they cannot
> change anything by their votes. Who ever elected would follow the
interests
> of their sponsors not voters. That is exactly as it is.
>
> However, in my system the people will not vote for their leaders. Best
> leader will simply take the job but will be extremely responsible to the
> people. On the other hand the people will directly establish the policy of
> society on the first place the economic policy. That means they will
> directly decide about incomes, taxes, and about the development of
society.
> No one would refuse to vote about that.
>
> Aleksandar Sarovic
> www.sarovic.com
>
>
>
>
>