Re: This is the future of mankind anyway

How do you propose to have everyone voting?
force them?
Right now in the Democracies only a tiny porcentage of people bother to
vote.That means that only that tiny porcentage will have a saying in the
decision ,making process,thus creating an "elite" that would vote for their
own benefit,the end result will be the same as always,a minority deciding
the course of humankind and we already have that ,don`t you think?


"Aleksandar Sarovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >
> > Aleksandar, I'm essentially an idealist so I like the concepts you
> > have proposed but there still seems to be some stuff I'm not sure
> > about.
>
>
> Nice to be an idealist but I am a rationalist.
>
>
> > 1) Having every person in the world vote on every descision would be
> > great but I think that placing that much trust in the internet is a
> > bit nieve.  It will never be completely secure and not everyone can
> > afford access.  Plus if a cable or a main hub is overloaded, it is not
> > just a communication problem but also a political one.
>
>
>
> I did not say every person around the world will vote on every decision.
> That would be to much to work. I believe voters should decide only about
> strategic decisions. Once the system is established we are talking
probably
> only about four decisions. And each voter will be able to check his votes
> every day and to change them as many time as he wants daily. I cannot see
> any problem here and I am an IT kind of guy. I've already bought a lot of
> things through internet which requires much more security than voting.
>
>
>
>
> > 2) You said that if one party was to not pay taxes then all other
> > parties must also agree.  If that is the case.. nothing with get done
> > cause there will always be someone who disagrees.
>
>
>
> First, everything will be the same as it is today unless the political
> parties agree upon changes. Second, I am talking here about municipalities
> that have from 1,000 up to 1,000,000 inhabitants. Third, I am talking
about
> the best possible system that will bring fast progress to the people of
> first commune around the world that accept such a system and agree about
> their policy. Conclusion = Those communities that will not agree fast will
> lose many benefits and conveniences that the previous one will get and
they
> will see it and after that they will work hard to find agreement about
their
> policies and they will do it. 2+2 = 4
>
>
> > Cheers,  Andrew
>
>
> I like your post.
> --
> Aleksandar Sarovic
> www.sarovic.com
>
>