
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Glamkowski) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > God said (in Genesis) that the land belongs to the children > of Abraham forever and ever. Correct. And God always mentioned that the children of Abraham will be so plentiful that they like the sand of the desert and the stars of the sky. If God's promise is true, most of the world population by now are children of Abraham. > When Abraham had children > through two different wives (Sarah and Hagar). God later > clarified the problem by saying the land belongs to the > children of Isaac (son of Sarah, i.e. the jews). Er... No. Please check the Book of Genesis again, you will find no where it's listed that the land belongs solely toward the children of Isaac. What you find however is... God give another promise to Abraham to an already existing one. God said that He will make a new promise Abraham asked God if He would also squezed in Ishmael into this new promise, God said no, and mentioned instead that Ishmael will the origin of a great nation. So... It's like this. Person A (God) asked for Contractor B (Abraham) to do a certain project (the population of a land), Contractor B (Abraham) agrees. Then later on, Person A asked for Contractor B to another project (the Jesus project maybe? Starting from Isaac to Jesus), this time using the child company of Contractor B, which is Contractor D (Isaac). Contractor B as Nepotism as ever wanted all of his children companies to get every project from Person A, so he asked Person A if Contractor C (the child company of Contractor B, a.k.a. Ishmael) can also do the project, however Person A refused, though Person A said that Contractor C can also do another project (great nation, which is essentially, the strongified version of the first project). Later on, Contractor C and Contractor D merge into a single company, which is sometimes refered as Contractor C or Contractor D or Contractor C and D. However, there's another Contractor named Contractor Z (that exist long before Contractor B ever created), who wants all the works for itself, so it falsifies all data so that it could get all of Contractor C and D works. Not only that, it also the workers of Contractor C and D, and also use the workers of Contractor C and D to destroy Contractor C and D. Then Contractor Z tricked Contractor C and D to fight itself, to death! > The > children of Ishmael (son of Hagar, i.e. the arabs), were > promised a great nation instead. Actually, by now, it doesn't matter anymore who is the children of Ishmael and who is a children of Isaac, since by now, those two lineages are already throughly mixed and by now probably most of the world population are now both children of Ishmael and children of Isaac. You will find in the Bible that the crossbreeding of the children of Ishmael and the children of Isaac already happened a long time ago. http://www.aboutbibleprophecy.com/q19.htm And really, if there's any sort of rivarly between the children of Ishmael and the children of Isaac, the Book of Genesis would have already mentioned. In other words, could be this so called rivarly between the children of Ishmael and the children of Isaac is a newly intentionally created myth in order to achieve a certain goal? > Zionists are evil? "Zion" is a Canaanite word. Some of the Canaanites are sworn enemy of the children of Israel. When David conquered the "Castle of Zion", he renamed it into the "City of David", David obviously don't want to use his enemy word for his newly conquest territory. > I seriously doubt we would have avoided 9/11. It's been pre-planned by the Zionist. And the USoA government is under their control. How much the USoA government's financial debt? Let see... Around 34000 billion US Dollars?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |