
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Any ideas how to kill off the winner takes all thing? It is really bad when someone gets 35 or 40 percent of the vote and beats off the 3 others who got the other 60 to 65%. Ideal way for little hitlers to become big strong hitlers. I come from the republic of Ireland. There, we have a thing called the single transferrable vote which basically means that if the 35% guy is nasty to minoritys or too bad a crook, they can gang up on him (in voting terms) and prevent him from gaining power. The divide and conquer politics of straight vote countrys is not so easy because if you try it, you create 2 enemys instead of 2 victims. It means that politicians in the south of ireland have to use more temperate language than those in the straight vote north. Rabble risers find it difficult to gain power in the south. Here in BC canada, the provincial government has decided not to bring in a law which would have allowed landlords to raise rents (and backdate the rent increase for 3 years). (We have the straight vote in canada) The BC liberals got 77 of 79 seats on just over 50% of the vote last time. They have absolute power without check and it has gone to their heads. In Ireland by contrast, a party cannot get such power because there are generally one or 2 alternative governments possible. Not just the tired old right wing, left wing thing that we have here (with the moderate centre vacant). Anyway, just wondering if there is a practical grass roots way of dilivering change to a stupid old system that brings crazy swings from left to right every 8 or 10 years? By the way, I come from a minority in Ireland, I felt protected by the electoral system and I met a lady from here and that is why I left. (Fending off the "if it was so good why did you leave?" stuff before it starts! Brian White
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |