
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Aronesty) wrote: >If we charged people a $200 federal tax penalty for failing to vote in >a federal election, it would stir a subtle but powerful shift in the >counciousness of the country. It would also be unconstitutional. Consider not voting is a statement on the state of affairs itself. a sort of 'none-of-the-above'. > >People, feeling compelled to vote, would also feel compelled to talk >about voting. If only to complain about it! But that's OK. This talk >would lead, over time, to political discussion and involvement. And, >finally, a restoration of "Democratic" part of the Democratic Republic >known as the United States. > >It's a slow process. But, I think, it's something that's nonpartisan, >and something that we can probably agree on. > >At the very least, we could begin to enact it on a state level - in as >many states as possible. > >I would have said that we could start with California. But now that a >Republican is in charge, I doubt it would pass. I'm not sure that >Republicans really want people to vote. I think they'd rather just >run the show and have nobody vote at all. > >Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. Talent on loan from Merck
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |