Re: This is the future of mankind anyway

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> Aleksandar, I'm essentially an idealist so I like the concepts you
> have proposed but there still seems to be some stuff I'm not sure
> about.


Nice to be an idealist but I am a rationalist.


> 1) Having every person in the world vote on every descision would be
> great but I think that placing that much trust in the internet is a
> bit nieve.  It will never be completely secure and not everyone can
> afford access.  Plus if a cable or a main hub is overloaded, it is not
> just a communication problem but also a political one.



I did not say every person around the world will vote on every decision.
That would be to much to work. I believe voters should decide only about
strategic decisions. Once the system is established we are talking probably
only about four decisions. And each voter will be able to check his votes
every day and to change them as many time as he wants daily. I cannot see
any problem here and I am an IT kind of guy. I've already bought a lot of
things through internet which requires much more security than voting.




> 2) You said that if one party was to not pay taxes then all other
> parties must also agree.  If that is the case.. nothing with get done
> cause there will always be someone who disagrees.



First, everything will be the same as it is today unless the political
parties agree upon changes. Second, I am talking here about municipalities
that have from 1,000 up to 1,000,000 inhabitants. Third, I am talking about
the best possible system that will bring fast progress to the people of
first commune around the world that accept such a system and agree about
their policy. Conclusion = Those communities that will not agree fast will
lose many benefits and conveniences that the previous one will get and they
will see it and after that they will work hard to find agreement about their
policies and they will do it. 2+2 = 4


> Cheers,  Andrew


I like your post.
--
Aleksandar Sarovic
www.sarovic.com