Re: This is the future of mankind anyway

Have you ever considered that you might be wrong?


"Aleksandar Sarovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Al" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Aleksandar Sarovic wrote:
> >
> > > "Al" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > >>
> > >> The society you envision would do this. You wrote that society would
> > > choose
> > >> the values it felt most important, and then assign to each individual
a
> > >> value ('the productive power of man') that reflected how many of
those
> > >> values he had. By definition, the values that commanded the greatest
> and
> > >> widest support in society would be the lowest values supported by
most
> > >> people: the lowest common denominator.
> > >>
> > >> It is popular to say "Blame the immigrants! Send the home!", and wise
> to
> > > say
> > >> "Immigration improve our country! Welcome them in!". In your
> 'Democratic
> > >> Anarchy', what is popular is more important than what is wise; what
> > >> gratifies immediately the largest number of people is more important
> than
> > >> what is best for the longer term.
> > >
> > > I am glad you did not complain to rules established by the consensus
of
> > > political parties that will create the value of productive power of
man.
> >
> > Only because I didn't get round to it. :-)
> >
> > > That rules will be the most important ones at the beginning and they
> would
> > > never make "Blame the immigrants! Send the home!" because at least one
> > > party will never allow it.
> >
> > Then if one party says "No to Any Taxes", the same thing would happen?
Who
> > then would pay for the roads to be maintained?
>
>
> All parties has to agree with "No to Any Taxes" in order that happens but
> that would hardly happen.
>
>
> > > Also in my system the "immigrant problem" will be a totally non
existent
> > > one and you may find more about it by reading my book However, I am
> taking
> > > the "Immigrant problem" as metaphor for all others non acceptable
> opinions
> > > and behaviour that exists in today's society. First of all, my society
> > > will be totally different one and that means it will probably generate
> > > totally different problems. Here is a sample: If your chief is a jerk,
> > > most likely you would not have guts to respond to him but you may be
> hard
> > > to someone else just because of it. Do you believe that kind of
> behaviour
> > > is the main origin for nationalism and racism?
> >
> > I don't believe that, no.
>
>
> Then you need some education and wisdom.
>
>
> > > In my system there will not
> > > be privileged people so that such problem would hardly exist.
> >
> > There must always be privileged people; those who do more for their
> > community must be rewarded, if only to motivate others to emulate them.
>
>
>
> Rewarded does not mean privileged. In other words, people will be rewards
> according their contributions to society and that does not mean they are
> privileged.
>
>
>
> > > But it may
> > > exist of course. For that reason I said the power of evaluation among
> the
> > > people will at the beginning probably be one cent. If you get hundred
> > > negative evaluations it will cost you one dollar. No one would
actually
> > > care about one dollar. The most important information that such
receiver
> > > will get is that a 100 people do not like something about him. Well it
> is
> > > up to the gay who receives such evaluation to find out who is to
blame,
> > > him or these hundred people? I would know the answer immediately right
> now
> > > even in today's society. He may correct himself for his own good and
> then
> > > make a better society or not and everything would be as it is today.
> >
> > You will not make many friends with such words, and your system will
need
> > many, many friends before it is taken seriously.
> > --
> > Al
>
> It seems to me that you cannot get a basic logic. But don't worry you are
> not different from others here. I practice little bit for the real
> challenges that will come soon.
>
> Aleksandar Sarovic
>
>
>
>
>