
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On European defense and NATO...a letter to NATO leaders. by ESLaPorte Sat, Oct 18 2003 Slightly edited for this post from the one faxed to NATO leaders... Once again, there is "concern" for the European Union's attempts to have an independent defense capability. Well, what we could do is stand off and see if the Union has the political will to spend anything for a meaningful defense and move be on just "paper armies." Second, the Greens, "food not bombs" pacifists and the "citizen weapons inspectors" lunatic fringe (...of which there are more in Europe than anyplace else on Earth...) in European politics could place stumbling blocks in the way of a more "robust" European defense. "Decoupling" of our transatlantic relationship and a European defense that can replace NATO are a long ways off.but there are other ways to maintain and enhance our Alliance without a mortal fear of an independent, European Union defense capability. The greatest danger to the transatlantic relationship is not European Union defense, but in the mindset of NATO as a "Cold War military-alliance" only, without any other roles or functions. European defense can be another relationship that could be devolped between Europe and North America (include Canada also) and that is one of complimentary cooperation and the two-pillar approach. Robert Hunter in his book "The European Security and Defense Policy: NATO's Companion - or Competitor?" (2002, RAND Europe) advocates a balancing of the Atlantic Alliance's two pillars by encouraging the Union to develop its defense capabilities in a fashion that are not redundant in NATO and would compliment our transatlantic security. Hunter advocates a complimentary security arrangement, not a competitive relationship between the Union and NATO on defense. The Union, as NATO is currently, should also develop security capabilities that are more suited for the war on terrorism and not some organized military invasion, as was the thinking during the Cold War. For example, I believe that there could be a civilian security/law enforcement committee created in NATO. As you know, such a committee would be under the control of the North Atlantic Council (as well as create it) and still maintain our tradition here in the Atlantic Community of the separation of the military and civilian authorities. Such a committee on civilian security in NATO, fostering civil cooperation between North America and the Union in the war on terrorism, could be highly effective and enhance our transatlantic relationship, as well as protect our collective civilization from non-state, terrorist-actors. We are already doing something like this in NATO with our EAPC Partners in Eastern Europe. NATO should be mulitfunctionalized and an equal, cooperative relationship should be sought between North America and the European Union. Wesley Clark advocates the mulitfunctionalizing of NATO - and that is the main reason why I am involved in our former SACEUR's presidential bid in my local community. We need not decouple our transatlantic alliance, but mulitfunctionalize it and make it a complimentary relationship across the Atlantic Community. Part of this solution is ridding the NATO Alliance -once and for all- of the Cold War notion that it is a military-only alliance and cannot take on any other roles and functions. The Union and America's Allies should not occupy a second class status to America in a two pillar system, but be equals in a real "new NATO" that has role functions other than just Cold War, military-defensive. It is my fear that, given the current presidential administration's penchant for global bullying and unilateralism, the perceived "need" of the Europeans to have an independent military defense from NATO will "only get worse." One of the major failings of the Bush administration was the failure to harness the European sympathies into a cooperative force against terrorism and create an unbreakable transatlantic relationship based on America as an equal and not a task-master. We could've had our European Allies as equals in a NATO that has been purged of the Cold War mindset and has roles and missions that are more than just the military-defensive - and this could've been an awsome sight against our enemies. -- Erin LaPorte The NATO Citizen - www.pronato.com P.O. Box 371162 Milwaukee, Wisconsin - USA 53237-2062 "In service of peace and freedom!"
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |