Re: Wesley Clark: Still Not a Democrat

And Nader never joined the Green party


> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Simpson)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Newsgroups: 
> alt.politics.green.party,alt.politics.greens,alt.politics.liberal,alt.society.
> liberalism,talk.politics.peace
> Date: 2 Oct 2003 14:45:19 -0700
> Subject: Re: Wesley Clark: Still Not a Democrat
> 
> Martin McPhillips wrote:
> 
>>> GASP!!!!
>>> 
>>> He really scares you guys doesn't he?
> 
> (Note the predictable, worthless B.S. response from a Clark-fraud
> defender.)
> 
> 
> [M. McP.:]
> 
>> The only people who have to worry about Wesley
>> Clark are Democrats. Republicans will have to
>> worry about him after he's drubbed by Democrats
>> and he considers switching sides.
>> 
>> Clark is a numbnuts. Dean is a hysteric. That
>> means that unless Hillary gets into the race the
>> nomination will go to one of the establishment
>> candidates: Kerry, Lieberman, Gephardt.
> 
> Along with the obvious suspicion that the Clintons and McAuliffe are
> behind this possibly to get Hillary back in the White House even
> earlier than originally intended, in 2008, at a minimum this is being
> done by the heads of the Democratic Party to wreck the Dean campaign.
> (That it also exploits the desperation and gullibility of Democratic
> voters is obvious, given the result as soon as Clark was introduced
> into the race.)
> 
> 
>> Hillary will wait until the third quarter GDP
>> numbers come in on October 30 before
>> she makes her decision. If the economy
>> sank back to 2.0 or 2.5% growth, she might
>> not be able to resist her feral hunger to
>> regain power. If the economy is growing
>> at 4.0 or 4.5% or higher, it's unlikely she'll
>> jump in.
> 
> Yep.
> 
> The main strategy that has been suspected all along is to get Dubya
> re-elected next year, then he's through (and a lame duck) and the GOP
> is forced to start over from scratch (can anyone see Cheney succeeding
> Dubya?) with nobody strong to run.  (Neither Powell nor Rice look to
> be running, and the only GOP member with heavyweight potential,
> Rumsfeld, probably could never be elected President.)
> 
> However, that changes if Bush looks beatable after all.  Never mind
> Iraq nor the economy, which hasn't gone away as an issue, either, just
> been upstaged; what about things like this CIA identity issue?  And
> what of those who see more omens, such as not only the GOP Senators'
> reluctance to rubber-stamp the $87B for Iraq, but even omen-ish events
> like the news about Rush Limbaugh and drugs that has got to get
> liberals everywhere stirred up, seeing the chance that one of their
> most hated icons that they could never defect may fall after all?
> 
> Plus don't forget how in the 2000 campaign it looked like Al Gore
> had a lock on everything, and then Gore proceeded to not only be sunk
> by Clinton but also defeat himself, and in the end lost the debates to
> Dubya, which was a sign that Dubya could win after all -- which he
> then did.
> 
> I wonder if Hillary, even if she still sticks to strategy as you
> point out, M. McP., is getting an itch lately on that trigger finger.
> 
> 
> Dave Simpson