Re: Wesley Clark: Still Not a Democrat

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:29:06 -0500, "Sarah"
> <newsgroupsdon'[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >It may come as a surprise to some of his supporters, but Democratic
> >Presidential candidate Wesley K. Clark still hasn't joined the
> >Democratic Party. According to the Pulaski County (Ark.) Voter
> >Registrar's office, the former four-star general remains a
registered
> >independent. Even though he has been a declared candidate for the
Dem
> >nomination for two weeks now, he has yet to officially change his
> >party affiliation.
>
> GASP!!!!
>
> He really scares you guys doesn't he?
>
> Here's why:
>
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20030929
>
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20030930
>
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20031001
>
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20031002

No, he scares me because I don't know who or what he really is or what
he stands for.  But running as a Dem when he isn't even registered as
one - especially after having been a Republican supporter does indeed
bother me.

I read doonesbury almost every day and really enjoy it.  But that is
not yet revealing some of the info coming out about Clark.

If I was a Republican maybe I would be cheering him on.  But I am not
a Republican and so I worry about what he is and what his policies
would really be and why he is really running.  I don't put it past the
folks tugging the money strings to not be attempting to control the
outcome of the election regardless of which party wins.