
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1097872,00.html A moment to be seized Leader Tuesday December 2, 2003 The Guardian It is evident that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will not be resolved until current rather than former leaders in both governments can bring themselves to agree. Similarly, the public statement of support for yesterday's unofficial Geneva accord, signed by dozens of retired or out-of-office political luminaries, including the likes of Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Jacques Delors and Mikhail Gorbachev, while welcome, is hardly tide-turning. The role of Nobel prizewinner Jimmy Carter in Geneva again confirms his reputation as a truly international statesman. But if the outside world is to have a positive, practical influence on events, it will require more in the way of concerted, focused efforts by present-day leaderships, principally in the US but also in the EU and Arab League. That said, the Geneva accord marks a hopeful moment. It comprises a comprehensive blueprint for an overall, lasting two-state solution, building in part on the efforts of Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon's predecessor, Ehud Barak, and Bill Clinton. In some ways, it is notably radical, for example in its prescriptions concerning contentious issues like the return of Palestinians to what is now Israel and future arrangements in Jerusalem. In a climate of continuing, low-level violence, mutual distrust and polarisation, its ambitiously holistic approach is unlikely to replace the step-by-step process adopted during the Oslo accords and by the officially endorsed "road map", at least in the short term. Neither Mr Sharon nor, more ambiguously, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat appear ready to embrace it. Indeed, Mr Sharon's government professes to see the whole Geneva effort as an unwelcome, even subversive exercise. Yet both sides should pause and consider. The Geneva accord's most important use could be as a catalyst, as a tool for changing perceptions. Already, its constructive influence is discernible. As ordinary people become more familiar with the plan, they have become more supportive, as a new Ha'aretz poll suggests (although many remain mistrustful). The accord has also inspired, or provoked, a spate of other unofficial peace proposals, ranging from the bilateral People's Voice petition to initiatives emanating from within Israel's opposition Labour party, Mr Sharon's coalition and the rightwing settler movement. In recent months, amid many terrible and tragic events, amid political infighting and loss of control in the Palestinian camp, and amid intensifying fears in Israel and beyond about the rise of a "new" anti-semitism, there has been reason to despair that any acceptable way forward will be found. Positions have grown entrenched, as symbolised by Israel's security fence. Official peacemaking ground to a halt, with the Americans distracted. The road map was increasingly dismissed as dead. Yet the Geneva accord and the other plans, even if they progress no further in purely substantive terms, have shown that despite this pervasive gloom, a large constituency for peace does still exist on both sides of the divide. The question is how best to tap into it. The possible connection between this hopeful upsurge in peacemaking efforts and the relative lull in violence is also worth careful consideration. There have been no suicide bombings or targeted assassinations for almost two months, although the timing of an Israeli operation in Ramallah yesterday was distinctly unhelpful. Meanwhile, there has been a marked acceleration in official, behind-the-scenes contacts, not least in London last week. Egypt is again trying to induce hardline Palestinian factions to agree to a ceasefire. The US envoy, William Burns, is back on the job at last. Even Mr Sharon is once more talking about talks - and "painful concessions". It is just possible that mindsets are changing. This is a moment to be seized, not squandered. -- -- FAIR USE NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - GW Bush 12/18/2000. "To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." ---Theodore Roosevelt "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq." -- Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz,
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |