Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Voters Increasingly Split Along Religious Lines



http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/news/7382330.htm

American voters increasingly split along religious lines
By STEVEN THOMMA
Knight Ridder Newspapers


DES MOINES, Iowa - Want to know how Americans will vote next Election Day?
Watch what they do the weekend before.

If they attend religious services regularly, they probably will vote
Republican by a 2-1 margin. If they never go, they likely will vote
Democratic by a 2-1 margin.

This relatively new fault line in American life is a major reason that the
country is politically polarized. And the division over religion and
politics is likely to continue or even grow in 2004.

A new poll by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center For The People & The Press
this fall confirmed that the gap remains; voters who frequently attend
religious services tilt 63-37 percent to Bush and those who never attend
lean 62-38 percent toward Democrats.

"We now have the widest gap we have ever had between Republicans and
Democrats," said Andy Kohut, the director of the Pew survey.

"It's THE most powerful predictor of party ID and partisan voting
intention," said Thomas Mann, a political scholar at the Brookings
Institution, a center-left Washington research center. "And in a society
that values religion as much as (this one), when there are high levels of
religious belief and commitment and practice, that's significant."

President Bush is a churchgoing Christian who often mixes theology with
public policies ranging from the war on terrorism to a ban on a specific
type of late-term abortion. By contrast, most leading Democratic candidates
for president keep their campaigns secular, seldom mentioning God, religion
or attending church, except for the occasional well-publicized visit to an
African-American church.

The most notable exception among top-tier candidates is Sen. Joseph
Lieberman of Connecticut, a Jew who frequently invokes God, casts policy
issues in moral terms and refuses to campaign on the Sabbath.

The Rev. Al Sharpton is religious too, of course, but polls show he's
favored by fewer than 1 percent of likely Democratic voters in New
Hampshire, the first primary state.

In contrast, the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, former Vermont
Gov. Howard Dean, said recently that he prayed privately, but quit being an
Episcopalian in a dispute with his parish over a bike path, recently linked
God with guns and gays in a list of issues that shouldn't influence voting
and doesn't regularly attend church. Nor do most of his chief rivals.

It wasn't always so. Most Democratic candidates through the 20th century
were openly religious. Born-again Christian Jimmy Carter ran in 1976 as much
a moral messenger ("I will never lie to you") as a champion of the
Democratic policy agenda. Bill Clinton could quote the Bible as readily as
the party platform. The one exception: John F. Kennedy played down his Roman
Catholic faith in 1960, when anti-Catholic bias was still common.

Voters weren't split by the frequency of their visits to church, synagogue
or mosque until recently. The gap started growing in the 1990s and became
clear in the 2000 election between Bush and Democrat Al Gore. Voters who
attended religious services more than once a week went for Bush by a margin
of nearly 2-1. Those who never went to services went for Gore by the same
margin.

The schism began as a countermovement to the culture wars of the 1960s. By
the late 1970s, conservative Democrats, notably evangelical Christians in
the South and ethnic Catholics in the North, found many of their values
under assault, particularly in regard to legalized abortion and gay rights,
according to Dennis Goldford, a political scientist who teaches a course in
religion and politics at Drake University in Iowa.

Many disaffected voters became Republicans, who cast their party as the
champion of conservative religious values with the help of the Rev. Jerry
Falwell's Moral Majority and the Rev. Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition.

Democrats reacted by pulling away from public discussion of religion.

"Liberals thought the ayatollahs were taking over the country," Goldford
said. "The Democrats haven't figured out how to talk about it. Many just
aren't comfortable with the talk of God."

Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, who managed Gore's 2000 campaign,
recalled recently that she felt uncomfortable even mentioning her religion
while working in the 1988 presidential campaign of Michael Dukakis. "I
couldn't talk about my faith," she said, adding that she thought the party
got better under Clinton and Gore.

"It is a problem," said Dick Harpootlian, a Democratic strategist and former
state party chairman in South Carolina. He said Democrats should be more
comfortable talking about religion, particularly as it relates to principles
such as tolerance and helping the poor and weak.

"Democrats have a much more Christian, religiously friendly message," he
said. "But if you go to a Democratic meeting, they don't open it with a
prayer."

The biggest exception among Democrats is African-Americans. They tend to be
religious and regular churchgoers. Democratic candidates frequently attend
African-American churches to appeal for support.

While in Detroit to attend a nationally televised debate on a recent Sunday,
for example, most Democratic candidates spent the morning in black churches.
Pumped up by a backdrop of drums, music, singing and dancing, Dean told the
congregation at one church, "It's going to be a long time before I go to a
white church again."

Indeed, Dean isn't a regular churchgoer. Baptized Catholic, he later became
an Episcopalian. He quit that denomination because he had what he called "a
big fight" with a Vermont Episcopal church over plans for a bike path on
church-controlled property. He became a Congregationalist, but said recently
that he didn't attend church very often.

On a recent visit to Tallahassee, Fla., Dean all but lumped God with other
divisive social issues. "We have got to stop having our elections in the
South based on race, guns, God and gays," he said, "and start having them
based on jobs and health insurance and a foreign policy that's consistent
with American values."

Dean isn't alone among major Democratic contenders who're rarely seen at
church.

Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts occasionally attends Catholic Mass, but is
"very private about his religion," said aide David Wade. "If he's in
someplace like Davenport or Dubuque, with a big Catholic community, he'll go
to church."

Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri, another major contender, mentions when
campaigning that he had a Baptist church scholarship for college. But he
doesn't mention God or religion beyond that. "He is a religious person,"
said aide Erik Smith. "He does not regularly go to church."

Smith conceded the political challenge. "Republican candidates," he said,
"have been talking to those who worship regularly in a language they can
relate to. Too often, Democrats speak a more secular language that they're
unable to relate to."

Retired Gen. Wesley Clark's father was Jewish, but Clark was raised first as
a Methodist, then as a Baptist, converted to Catholicism as a young adult
and now attends the Presbyterian Church. "I'm spiritual. I'm religious. I'm
a strong Christian and I'm a Catholic, but I go to Presbyterian Church,"
Clark said in an interview this week being circulated by his campaign.

Lieberman, who does speak the language of faith and religion, said his party
should set aside its aversion to religion and embrace it as a message
harmonious with its core principles. But he insisted that any such stance
must be born of principal, not politics.

"I didn't become religious because of a focus group," he said. "I have a
sense of mission. . Republicans act as if they have a monopoly on values or
faith-based values. They don't."


--
--
FAIR USE NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am
making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and
social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so
long as I'm the dictator." - GW Bush 12/18/2000.

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic
and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
---Theodore Roosevelt

"I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of
Iraq."
-- Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz,






<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.