Re: ESTABLISHING THE RELIGION OF ATHEISM

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:07:05 +0800, "Raymond"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 22:19:54 +0800, "Raymond"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"nullus fides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> And so upon Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:47:03 +0000 didst Corey speak thusly:
>
>> >The Atheist creed is there is no god, no faith, no here after,
>>
>> There is no creed; there is only the lack of one belief.
>>
>> >and lots of other things, they are very evangelistic like the Church and
>go
>> >out of their way to preach their ideas.  They go out of their way to
>convert
>> >people to their ideas, and even fight in court if a Christmas tree or
>sign
>> >or manger is put up, that disagrees with their belief system.  For all
>> >practical purposes they are a religion.
>>
>>
>> There is only one thing required to be an atheist - non belief.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >If I am wrong, prove it, just done say it is wrong as that is Wrong.
>>
>> You are wrong because it is merely the lack of a belief.
>

>Thank you, point one in your CREED.  

A creed is a belief.  I do not have a religious creed.  Religious
people do.


"A belief" as you just pointed out,
>that belief must be the confession of not having a belief in God, or the
>"lack of a belief".   

A lack of a belief is not a belief.  If I said positively that there
is no god, that would be a belief.  I do not say any such thing.  Try
to think Raymond.  It will only hurt a little bit.


>You may not want to call it a creed, but that is the
>beginning of anyone joining your atheistic group.  Just like a Church, they
>need to have merely a belief in God.

I do not belong to any atheist group.   I have no creed.  You are
babbling.



>
>> None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
>> "But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
>

>Then the Emperor's clothing was just a story, and no foundation in fact, the
>Church is here the Emperor's clothing is just what the atheist would wear,
>nothing at all.   If you take it anyplace, you got a person in your story,
>only the cloths are not there, so you know believe in God, only can see his
>clothing.   Very poor analogy to use.  Please do better next time, think
>before posting.
>
>Thank you, its been all my pleasure indeed.
>

You are truly one of the most amazing morons I have ever encountered.


None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.