Re: Evidence Mounts That U.S. Military is LYING About "Victory At Samarra"

"Seawolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "Winston Smith, American Patriot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "David Hartung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in inimitable style:
> >
> > >
> > > " fãhç" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >> "David Hartung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2. When the civilians "grabbed guns" and joined the fight, they
> > >> > became combatants, and thus were subject to being shot by the
> > >> > American troops.
> > >>
> > >> If you saw your children, friends, and loved ones being killed
> > >> indiscriminately by invaders firing in every direction in your home
> > >> town, would you not pick up arms and fight back?  Or would you cower
> > >> in a corner like a submissive little creature and let them mow down
> > >> your home town?
> > >
> > > 1. there is no proof that the claims of indescriminate firing are
> > > true.
> >
> > "Platoon", "The Boys in Company C", "Apocalypse Now", "Full Metal Jacket":
> > what do these portrayals of the fighting in Vietnam in particular and war
> > in general have in common?
> >
> > That when all hell breaks loose, all hell breaks loose....and if it moves,
> > it dies.
> 
> 
> Yes!  We should all base our beliefs on Hollywood movies!
> 
> >
> > > 2. Whether or not these people were defending their families in this
> > > instance does not change the fact that as soon as they became part of
> > > the fight, they became targets.
> >
> > They shouldn't have been part of the fight at all then, because the troops
> > were likely there to provoke or antagonize them.  Of course their mere
> > presence as ILLEGAL and CRIMINAL OCCUPIERS is provocation and antagonism
> > enough.  It would be if there were invaders in my homeland.
> 
> So the fact that the UN made numerous resolutions against Iraq means
> nothing?
> 
> >
> > But then because you accept that Americans can invade Iraq unjustly, then
> > you ought to be willing to put up with those who occupy your city after an
> > illegal invasion.
> 
> What was illegal about it?  Saddam expelled the UN Weapons inspectors, a
> violation of the cease fire agreement, by expelling the inspectors he
> nullified the cease fire agreement and, technically, restarted the war.
> 
>   You wouldn't really want to be a hypocrite now, wouldya?
> 
> What's hypocritical?
> 
> Brent

Saddam expelled no inspectors. Get your facts right moron.

Stevel