
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Comrade and Fellow Traveler Billary, I was out taking a whizz when this was being discussed, but I made it back in time for the secret handshake. Would you mind sharing your secret neo-con meeting notes with me. When I want to question Mr. Bush, do I make my aluminum hat shiny side in or out? "Billary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > We do question Mr. Bush when we think something is wrong. But we don't do it > not on this newsgroup. We have our own secret communications mechanism for > doing that. Would you like to know what it is comrade? > > > > "Mr. Obvious" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:17:53 GMT, Billary wrote: > > > > > That was funny...You liberals have a very narrow view of Bush > supporters. > > > And a big bad socialist view of "evil corporations". VP Cheney didn't > need > > > a war to reap obnoxious profits. No person in pwoer needs a war to > profit. > > > All anyone in authority has to do is just casually mention the word > "war" to > > > a liberal mainstream reporter and then short the oil markets. The press > > > would have a field day with the story...No one would have been killed > and he > > > would have made hundreds of millions of dollars. > > > > > > This is about defeating terror not reaping profits. That's why Howard > "the > > > duck" Dean will lose to Mr. Bush. It's time you got on the bandwagon. > > > You're on the wrong side of history. > > And you STILL don't see anything wrong with this picture. History is > pretty > > much going to be over very, very quickly if Dubyah gets elected. It won't > > matter who is on which side. > > All Iraq has ever been about is profit. Political profit, monetary profit. > > We create 10 new terrorists for each one we kill. They all have brothers > > and sisters and aunts and uncles and mothers and fathers and sons and > > daughters who now want revenge. We are polarizing the entire Middle East > > against us; not just the radicals, everyone. > > My view of Dubyah's supporters is based upon what you say, which is very > > narrow bandwidth--- Dubyah's way or the highway. I have never seen anyone > > who supports Dubyah in this group question ANYTHING the man does. Is he > > perfect? Apparently so in your mind. > > I don't get on any bandwagon, ever. Sheep get on bandwagons. > > Baaaa baaaa, Billary. > > > > > > > > > "Mr. Obvious" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:17:47 GMT, Billary wrote: > > >> > > >>> Iraq is now 54 trained terrorists lighter than they used to be. And > Harry > > >>> complains. Anyone of those 54 could have lived to kill another > American > > >>> another day. And this bleeding heart linguini spined liberal > complains > > >>> about 54 terrorists going to meet their maker. > > >>> > > >>> Why do you hate America so much Harry? > > >> Speaking only for myself, I don't hate America. I hate Dubyah's > duplicity > > >> and lack of moral fiber. I hate the fact that he has only one > goal---just > > >> one--- and that is getting elected. He doesn't care about you, me, the > > >> American people, the economy, the soldiers he has put in harm's way for > the > > >> bottom line of Cheney/Halliburton.... All he cares about is his > election. > > >> And apparently you NeoCons don't see anything wrong with this picture. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> "Harry Hope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > >>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>> > > >>>> From The Boston Globe, 11/14/03: > > >>>> > > >>> > > > > > http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2003/11/14/us_stays_blind_to_iraqi_casualties/ > > >>>> > > >>>> The mantra of the military from Tommy Franks down to his spokespeople > > >>>> was, "We don't do body counts." > > >>>> > > >>>> The most bald-faced expansion on that policy was given in April by > > >>>> Brigadier General Vincent Brooks of Central Command. > > >>>> > > >>>> "In all cases, we inflict a considerable amount of destruction on > > >>>> whatever force comes into contact with us," Brooks said. > > >>>> > > >>>> "It just is not worth trying to characterize by numbers. Frankly, if > > >>>> we are going to be honorable by the warfare, we are not out there > > >>>> trying to count up bodies." > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > > > ............................................................................ > > >>> ............... > > >>>> > > >>>> From The Associated Press, 12/1/03: > > >>>> > > >>> > > > > > http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-newsbrief,0,1411218.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines > > >>>> > > >>>> U.S.: 54 Iraqi Fighters Killed in Battle > > >>>> > > >>>> SAMARRA, Iraq (AP) -- > > >>>> > > >>>> The U.S. military said 54 Iraqis were killed in the northern city of > > >>>> Samarra as U.S. forces used tanks and cannons to fight their way out > > >>>> of simultaneous ambushes while delivering new Iraqi currency to > banks. > > >>>> > > >>>> But residents said Monday that the casualty figure was much lower and > > >>>> that the dead were mostly civilians. > > >>>> > > >>>> ___________________________________________________________ > > >>>> > > >>>> Harry > > >>>> > > >> > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |