Re: Billary is a lying asshole

"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> abracadabra wrote:
> >
> > "Billary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Iraq is now 54 trained terrorists lighter than they used to be.
> >
> > From witnesses on the ground -
> >
> > 'Many residents said Saddam loyalists attacked the Americans, but that
when
> > U.S. forces began firing at random, many civilians got their guns and
joined
> > the fight. Many said residents were bitter about recent U.S. raids in
the
> > night.
> >
> So we are bitter about being raided so we are going to do exactly what
> generates the raids in the first place. Really smart people, ha.

I don't know what happened, as there are conflicting reports.
But if the USA were an occupied country, Americans that murdered occupying
forces would be considered patriots.
Would you be a colaborator or a patriot?

> > ``Why do they arrest people when they're in their homes?'' asked Athir
Abdul
> > Salam, a 19-year-old student. ``They come at night to arrest people. So
what
> > do they expect those people to do?''
> >
> I don't know, how about stop attacking the Americans and generating the
> raids?

So you're like the Vichey French?

> > ``Civilians shot back at the Americans,''
> >
> Which then makes them targets. The rules of war say that you are
> supposed to differentiate yourself from the non-combatants in order to
> provide some way for your enemy to decide whether they should shoot or
> not. If you do not do that, then your enemy will be forced to shoot
> anything that moves. When that happens, that's your fault.

That attitude is why they are shooting at us.

> > said 30-year-old Ali Hassan, who
> > was wounded by shrapnel in the battle. ``They claim we are terrorists.
So
> > OK, we are terrorists. What do they expect when they drive among us?''
> >
> What do you expect when you shoot at us? If everyone is getting what he
> expected, what's the problem?




> No source for the above material

>From the New York Times, silly